Receptive field properties of human motion detector units inferred from spatial frequency masking
- PMID: 2635464
- DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90191-0
Receptive field properties of human motion detector units inferred from spatial frequency masking
Abstract
This study was designed to investigate the spatial frequency selectivity and spatial structure of receptive fields of motion sensitive mechanisms in human vision. Spatial frequency selectivity was inferred from masking measurements, using dynamic test and mask stimuli. For test frequencies between 0.025 and 15.0 c/deg, maximal masking occurred when the mask frequency matched that of the test, suggesting that the test was detected by mechanisms tuned to (or near to) that frequency. For tests below 0.025 c/deg or above 15.0 c/deg, maximal masking occurred at 0.025 and 15.0 c/deg, respectively, suggesting that there exist no mechanisms selective to frequencies outside these limits. A masking model, suitable for interpreting results obtained with drifting test stimuli, was developed and used to calculate spatial frequency selectivity functions from masking data. Assuming small signal linearity, and a constant phase spectrum, the selectivity functions were inverse-Fourier transformed to yield estimates of the extent and structure of receptive fields. Field width was found to vary with test spatial frequency from 5.8 deg at 0.03 c/deg to 0.05 deg at 10.0 c/deg. These estimates were compared with width estimates previously obtained by a summation technique (Anderson & Burr, 1987), and found to be similar over a wide range of spatial frequencies (2.5 log units). Gabor functions provided a reasonable fit to the calculated field profiles at high spatial frequencies (above 1.0 c/deg), but not at low frequencies.
Similar articles
-
Two-dimensional spatial and spatial-frequency selectivity of motion-sensitive mechanisms in human vision.J Opt Soc Am A. 1991 Aug;8(8):1340-51. doi: 10.1364/josaa.8.001340. J Opt Soc Am A. 1991. PMID: 1919837
-
Spatial summation properties of directionally selective mechanisms in human vision.J Opt Soc Am A. 1991 Aug;8(8):1330-9. doi: 10.1364/josaa.8.001330. J Opt Soc Am A. 1991. PMID: 1919836
-
Asymmetric spatial frequency tuning of motion mechanisms in human vision revealed by masking.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Aug;48(8):3897-904. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-1056. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007. PMID: 17652766
-
Effect of background components on spatial-frequency masking.J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1998 May;15(5):1027-35. doi: 10.1364/josaa.15.001027. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1998. PMID: 9579054
-
Seeing objects in motion.Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1986 Mar 22;227(1247):249-65. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1986.0022. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1986. PMID: 2871557
Cited by
-
Dynamic engagement of human motion detectors across space-time coordinates.J Neurosci. 2014 Jun 18;34(25):8449-61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5434-13.2014. J Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24948800 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
From Flashes to Edges to Objects: Recovery of Local Edge Fragments Initiates Spatiotemporal Boundary Formation.Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 28;7:910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00910. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27445886 Free PMC article.
-
Contrast thresholds reveal different visual masking functions in humans and praying mantises.Biol Open. 2018 Apr 26;7(4):bio029439. doi: 10.1242/bio.029439. Biol Open. 2018. PMID: 29700198 Free PMC article.
-
Invisible noise obscures visible signal in insect motion detection.Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 14;7(1):3496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03732-7. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28615659 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal whitening: transient noise perceptually equalizes the 1/f temporal amplitude spectrum.J Vis. 2009 Sep 16;9(10):12.1-19. doi: 10.1167/9.10.12. J Vis. 2009. PMID: 19810793 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources