Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;26(11):1521-50.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0659-4. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

A systematic review of dietary, nutritional, and physical activity interventions for the prevention of prostate cancer progression and mortality

Affiliations

A systematic review of dietary, nutritional, and physical activity interventions for the prevention of prostate cancer progression and mortality

Lucy E Hackshaw-McGeagh et al. Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Given the long-term, although potentially fatal, nature of prostate cancer, there is increasing observational evidence for the reduction in disease progression and mortality through changes in lifestyle factors.

Methods: We systematically reviewed dietary, nutritional, and physical activity randomized interventions aimed at modifying prostate cancer progression and disease-specific mortality, including a detailed assessment of risk of bias and methodological quality.

Results: Forty-four randomized controlled trials of lifestyle interventions, with prostate cancer progression or mortality outcomes, were identified. Substantial heterogeneity of the data prevented a meta-analysis. The included trials involved 3,418 prostate cancer patients, median 64 men per trial, from 13 countries. A trial of a nutritional supplement of pomegranate seed, green tea, broccoli, and turmeric; a trial comparing flaxseed, low-fat diet, flaxseed, and low-fat diet versus usual diet; and a trial supplementing soy, lycopene, selenium, and coenzyme Q10, all demonstrated beneficial effects. These trials were also assessed as having low risk of bias and high methodological quality (as were seven other trials with no evidence of benefit). The remaining trials were either underpowered, at high or unclear risk of bias, inadequately reported, of short duration or measured surrogate outcomes of unproven relationship to mortality or disease progression, which precluded any benefits reported being reliable.

Conclusion: Large, well-designed randomized trials with clinical endpoints are recommended for lifestyle modification interventions.

Keywords: Diet; Nutrition; Physical activity; Prostate cancer; Randomized controlled trials; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram

Comment in

References

    1. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51(1):15–36. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.51.1.15. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cancer Research UK (2013) Prostate cancer key facts. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/keyfacts/prostat...
    1. Cancer Research UK (2012) Prostate cancer incidence statistics. www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/prostate/incidence/
    1. Prostate Cancer UK (2012) Prostate Cancer: a guide for newly diagnosed men. http://prostatecanceruk.org/media/41578/newly_diagnosed_booklet.pdf
    1. Womble PR, Montie JE, Ye Z, Linsell SM, Lane BR, Miller DC. Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.024. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types