Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness
- PMID: 26355603
- DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000065
Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness
Abstract
Systematic review aims to systematically identify, critically appraise, and summarize all relevant studies that match predefined criteria and answer predefined questions. The most common type of systematic review is that assessing the effectiveness of an intervention or therapy. In this article, we discuss some of the common methodological issues that arise when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of effectiveness data, including issues related to study designs, meta-analysis, and the use and interpretation of effect sizes.
Similar articles
-
Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):147-53. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000054. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015. PMID: 26317388
-
Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):163-9. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000064. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015. PMID: 26262566
-
Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):132-40. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015. PMID: 26360830
-
Quality appraisal in systematic reviews of public health interventions: an empirical study on the impact of choice of tool on meta-analysis.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Jan;67(1):98-104. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200940. Epub 2012 Jul 31. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013. PMID: 22851579
-
Systematic reviews and their application to research in speech and language therapy: a response to T. R. Pring's 'Ask a silly question: two decades of troublesome trials' (2004).Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006 Jan-Feb;41(1):95-105. doi: 10.1080/13682820500071542. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006. PMID: 16272005 Review.
Cited by
-
Global prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022 Oct;28(4):864-875. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0136. Epub 2022 Jul 25. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 36263668 Free PMC article.
-
The Predictive Value of Three Variables in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune-Based Combination Therapies in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Oncol. 2022 Sep 10;2022:7733251. doi: 10.1155/2022/7733251. eCollection 2022. J Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36124031 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of SARS-CoV-2 on semen parameters: A meta-analysis of 39 articles from 15 countries.J Glob Health. 2024 Aug 30;14:05021. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.05021. J Glob Health. 2024. PMID: 39212663 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of depression and its association with health-related quality of life in people with heart failure in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0283146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283146. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36952483 Free PMC article.
-
Inadequate dietary diversity during pregnancy increases the risk of maternal anemia and low birth weight in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Food Sci Nutr. 2023 May 6;11(7):3706-3717. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3388. eCollection 2023 Jul. Food Sci Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37457158 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources