Ethical Questions in Medical Electronic Adherence Monitoring
- PMID: 26358284
- PMCID: PMC4762813
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3502-4
Ethical Questions in Medical Electronic Adherence Monitoring
Abstract
Electronic adherence monitors (EAMs) record and report an array of health behaviors, ranging from taking daily medications to wearing medical devices. EAMs are utilized in research worldwide and are being investigated for clinical use. However, there is also growing popular concern about the extent to which electronic devices may be used to monitor individuals, including allegations in the media that EAMs represent a move towards "Big Brother" in medicine. Here, we highlight the unique benefits as well as the potential ethical challenges that electronic adherence monitoring generates. These challenges surround autonomy, privacy and confidentiality, trust, and ancillary care obligations. We describe key questions within each of these domains that warrant further investigation, and present potential solutions to many of the concerns raised.
Keywords: confidentiality; electronic adherence monitoring; patient adherence; personal autonomy; privacy; research ethics.
References
-
- Rapoff MA. Adherence to pediatric medical regimens. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999.
-
- Ganyo M, Dunn M, Hope T. Ethical issues in the use of fall detectors. Ageing Soc. 2011;31(08):1350–67. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X10001443. - DOI
-
- Percival J, Hanson J. Big brother or brave new world? Telecare and its implications for older people’s independence and social inclusion. Crit Soc Policy. 2006;26(4):888–909. doi: 10.1177/0261018306068480. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources