Association between preoperative cervical sagittal deformity and inferior outcomes at 2-year follow-up in patients with adult thoracolumbar deformity: analysis of 182 patients
- PMID: 26360147
- DOI: 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE141098
Association between preoperative cervical sagittal deformity and inferior outcomes at 2-year follow-up in patients with adult thoracolumbar deformity: analysis of 182 patients
Abstract
Objective: A high prevalence of cervical deformity (CD) has been identified among adult patients with thoracolumbar spinal deformity undergoing surgical treatment. The clinical impact of this is uncertain. This study aimed to quantify the differences in patient-reported outcomes among patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) based on presence of CD prior to treatment.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of a multicenter prospective database of patients with ASD who underwent surgical treatment with 2-year follow-up. Patients were grouped by the presence of preoperative CD: 1) cervical positive sagittal malalignment (CPSM) C2-7 sagittal vertical axis ≥ 4 cm; 2) cervical kyphosis (CK) C2-7 angle > 0; 3) CPSM and CK (BOTH); and 4) no baseline CD (NONE). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores included the Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) scores of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (SRS-22), and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of these scores at 2 years. Standard radiographic measurements were conducted for cervical, thoracic, and thoracolumbar parameters.
Results: One hundred eighty-two patients were included in this study: CPSM, 45; CK, 37; BOTH, 16; and NONE, 84. Patients with preoperative CD and those without had similar baseline thoracolumbar radiographic measurements and similar correction rates at 2 years. Patients with and without preoperative CD had similar baseline HRQOL and on average both groups experienced some HRQOL improvement. However, those with preoperative CPSM had significantly worse postoperative ODI, PCS, SRS-22 Activity, SRS-22 Appearance, SRS-22 Pain, SRS-22 Satisfaction, and SRS-22 Total score, and were less likely to meet MCID for ODI, PCS, SRS-22 Activity, and SRS-22 Pain scores with the following ORs and 95% CIs: ODI 0.19 (0.07-0.58), PCS 0.17 (0.06-0.47), SRS-22 Activity 0.23 (0.09-0.62), SRS-22 Pain 0.20 (0.08-0.53), and SRS-22 Appearance 0.34 (0.12-0.94). Preoperative CK did not have an effect on outcomes. Interestingly, despite correction of the thoracolumbar deformity, 53.3% and 51.4% of patients had persistent CPSM and persistent CK, respectively.
Conclusions: Patients with thoracolumbar deformity without preoperative CD are likely to have greater improvements in HRQOL after surgery than patients with concomitant preoperative CD. Cervical positive sagittal alignment in adult patients with thoracolumbar deformity is strongly associated with inferior outcomes and failure to reach MCID at 2-year follow-up despite having similar baseline HRQOL to patients without CD. This was the first study to assess the impact of concomitant preoperative cervical malalignment in adult patients with thoracolumbar deformity. These results can help surgeons educate patients at risk for inferior outcomes and direct future research to identify an etiology and improve patient outcomes. Investigation into the etiology of the baseline cervical malalignment may be warranted in patients who present with thoracolumbar deformity.
Keywords: ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; ASD = adult spinal deformity; BMI = body mass index; CCI = Charlson Comorbidity Index; CD = cervical deformity; CK = cervical kyphosis; CL = cervical lordosis; CPSM = cervical positive sagittal malalignment; EBL = estimated blood loss; HRQOL = health-related quality of life; LL = lumbar lordosis; LOS = length of hospital stay; MCID = minimum clinically important difference; MCS = Mental Component Summary; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PCS = Physical Component Summary; PI-LL = mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis; PT = pelvic tilt; SF-36 = 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; SRS-22 = Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire; SVA = sagittal vertical axis; T1S = T-1 slope; T1S-CL = mismatch between T-1 slope and cervical lordosis; TK = thoracic kyphosis; adult spinal deformity; cervical deformity; cervical sagittal alignment; cervical sagittal vertical axis; health-related quality of life; minimum clinically important difference.
Similar articles
-
How the neck affects the back: changes in regional cervical sagittal alignment correlate to HRQOL improvement in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Aug;23(2):153-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE1441. Epub 2015 May 15. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015. PMID: 25978077
-
Magnitude of preoperative cervical lordotic compensation and C2-T3 angle are correlated to increased risk of postoperative sagittal spinal pelvic malalignment in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.Spine J. 2015 Aug 1;15(8):1756-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 8. Spine J. 2015. PMID: 25862507
-
The likelihood of reaching minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at 2 years following a 3-column osteotomy: analysis of 140 patients.J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):340-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE141031. Epub 2015 Jun 19. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015. PMID: 26091440
-
Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S149-60. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f449. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 24113358 Review.
-
Selective Thoracic Fusion of Lenke I and II Curves Affects Sagittal Profiles But Not Sagittal or Spinopelvic Alignment: A Case-Control Study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jun 15;40(12):926-34. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000861. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015. PMID: 26067149 Review.
Cited by
-
Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2021 Jun;30(6):1411-1439. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06825-0. Epub 2021 Mar 27. Eur Spine J. 2021. PMID: 33772659
-
The Effect of Prolonged Pre-Operative Halo Gravity Traction for Severe Spinal Deformities on the Cervical Spine Radiographs.Global Spine J. 2023 Mar;13(2):451-456. doi: 10.1177/2192568221998644. Epub 2021 Mar 8. Global Spine J. 2023. PMID: 33678056 Free PMC article.
-
Examining autocorrection of concurrent cervical malalignment following thoracolumbar deformity surgery.J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024 Jul-Sep;15(3):347-352. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_109_24. Epub 2024 Sep 12. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024. PMID: 39483829 Free PMC article.
-
Does Improvement towards a Normal Cervical Sagittal Configuration Aid in the Management of Lumbosacral Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 29;11(19):5768. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195768. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36233636 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison of Two Forward Head Posture Corrective Approaches in Elderly with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study.J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 9;12(2):542. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020542. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36675471 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous