Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Sep 11;5(9):e008547.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008547.

E-cigarette marketing in UK stores: an observational audit and retailers' views

Affiliations
Observational Study

E-cigarette marketing in UK stores: an observational audit and retailers' views

D Eadie et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To explore how e-cigarettes are being promoted at point of sale in the UK and how retailers perceive market trends.

Setting: Fixed retail outlets subject to a ban on the display of tobacco products.

Participants: Observational audit of all stores selling tobacco products (n=96) in 4 Scottish communities, conducted over 2 waves 12 months apart (2013-2014), and qualitative interviews with small retailers (n=25) in 4 matched communities.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The audit measured e-cigarette display characteristics, advertising materials and proximity to other products, and differences by area-level disadvantage. Interviews explored retailers' perceptions of e-cigarette market opportunities and risks, and customer responses.

Results: The number of e-cigarette point-of-sale display units and number of brands displayed increased between waves. E-cigarettes were displayed close to products of interest to children in 36% of stores. Stores in more affluent areas were less likely to have external e-cigarette advertising than those in deprived areas. Although e-cigarettes delivered high profit margins, retailers were confused by the diversity of brands and products, and uncertain of the sector's viability. Some customers were perceived to purchase e-cigarettes as cessation aids, and others, particularly low-income smokers, as a cheaper adjunct to conventional tobacco.

Conclusions: E-cigarette point-of-sale displays and number of brands displayed increased over 12 months, a potential cause for concern given their lack of regulation. Further scrutiny is needed of the content and effects of such advertising, and the potentially normalising effects of placing e-cigarettes next to products of interest to children.

Keywords: AUDIT; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kmietowicz Z. E-cigarettes latest: users on the up but rules tighten. BMJ 2014;349:g6444 10.1136/bmj.g6444 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauld L, Angus K, de Andrade M. E-cigarette uptake and marketing—a report commissioned by Public Health England. 2014.
    1. Regan AK, Promoff G, Dube SR et al. . Electronic nicotine delivery systems: adult use and awareness of the “e-cigarette” in the USA. Tob Control 2013;22:19–23. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050044 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adkison SE, O'Connor RJ, Bansal-Travers M et al. . Electronic nicotine delivery systems: International Tobacco Control four-country survey. Am J Prev Med 2013;44:207–15. 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu SH, Sun JY, Bonnevie E et al. . Four hundred and sixty brands and counting: implications for product regulation. Tob Control 2014;23(Suppl 3):iii3–9. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051670 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources