Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct 7;589(20 Pt A):3031-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

Modeling chromosomes: Beyond pretty pictures

Affiliations
Review

Modeling chromosomes: Beyond pretty pictures

Maxim V Imakaev et al. FEBS Lett. .

Abstract

Recently, Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) based experiments have highlighted the importance of computational models for the study of chromosome organization. In this review, we propose that current computational models can be grouped into roughly four classes, with two classes of data-driven models: consensus structures and data-driven ensembles, and two classes of de novo models: structural ensembles and mechanistic ensembles. Finally, we highlight specific questions mechanistic ensembles can address.

Keywords: Chromatin; Hi-C; Model; Polymer; Simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Left: Data-driven spatial models being with Hi-C maps. Then they usually convert the Hi-C map to a map of average pairwise distances or constraints. From the distance map, a single spatial conformation (consensus structure), or a set of spatial conformations is generated (data-driven ensemble). Some ensemble data-driven models then calculate the simulated Hi-C contact map and compare it to the original. Right: De novo approaches begin with a hypothesis, which is then used to develop a spatial model. This spatial model has hypothesis-dependent interactions in addition to basic polymer constraints. This model is then used to generate a set of conformations. These in turn can be used to calculate a simulated contact map by performing in silico Hi-C, which can be compared with the relevant experimental Hi-C map. This leads to either rejection of the initial hypothesis, or modification of the hypothesis or model parameters (e.g. loop length).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mechanistic ensembles based on loop extrusion can explain interphase and metaphase chromosomal organization. Left: In a model of loop extrusion, Loop Extruding Factors (LEFs) bind to chromatin and extrude a progressively larger loop [52]. Top: In interphase, a TAD organization can be achieved with a low density of LEFs that stall at boundary elements, potentially inwards-oriented CTCF sites [55]. Bottom: In metaphase, a homogeneous contact map with a slowly-decaying contact probability in agreement with experimental Hi-C maps can be achieved via loop extrusion as well. However, in this case the density of LEFs is higher and boundary elements are no longer present. In this case, LEFs extrude all available chromatin fiber, and form an array of consecutive loops [20].

References

    1. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science. 2002;295:1306–1311. - PubMed
    1. Zhao Z, Tavoosidana G, Sjolinder M, Gondor A, Mariano P, Wang S, Kanduri C, Lezcano M, Sandhu KS, Singh U, Pant V, Tiwari V, Kurukuti S, Ohlsson R. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1341–1347. - PubMed
    1. Simonis M, Klous P, Splinter E, Moshkin Y, Willemsen R, de Wit E, van Steensel B, de Laat W. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C) Nat Genet. 2006;38:1348–1354. - PubMed
    1. Dostie J, Richmond TA, Arnaout RA, Selzer RR, Lee WL, Honan TA, Rubio ED, Krumm A, Lamb J, Nusbaum C, Green RD, Dekker J. Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 2006;16:1299–1309. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO, Sandstrom R, Bernstein B, Bender MA, Groudine M, Gnirke A, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Mirny LA, Lander ES, Dekker J. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science. 2009;326:289–93. - PMC - PubMed

Key references

    1. Lajoie BR, Dekker J, Kaplan N. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Hi-C Analysis: Practical guidelines. Methods. 2014;72:65–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giorgetti L, Galupa R, Nora EP, Piolot T, Lam F, Dekker J, Tiana G, Heard E. Predictive polymer modeling reveals coupled fluctuations in chromosome conformation and transcription. Cell. 2014;157:950–963. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Naumova N, Imakaev M, Fudenberg G, Zhan Y, Lajoie BR, Mirny LA, Dekker J. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science. 2013;342:948–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosa A, Everaers R. Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008;4:e1000153. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alipour E, Marko JF. Self-organization of domain structures by DNA-loop-extruding enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:11202–12. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources