Can a dual-energy computed tomography predict unsuitable stone components for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?
- PMID: 26366277
- PMCID: PMC4565899
- DOI: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.644
Can a dual-energy computed tomography predict unsuitable stone components for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the potential of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to identify urinary stone components, particularly uric acid and calcium oxalate monohydrate, which are unsuitable for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).
Materials and methods: This clinical study included 246 patients who underwent removal of urinary stones and an analysis of stone components between November 2009 and August 2013. All patients received preoperative DECT using two energy values (80 kVp and 140 kVp). Hounsfield units (HU) were measured and matched to the stone component.
Results: Significant differences in HU values were observed between uric acid and nonuric acid stones at the 80 and 140 kVp energy values (p<0.001). All uric acid stones were red on color-coded DECT images, whereas 96.3% of the nonuric acid stones were blue. Patients with calcium oxalate stones were divided into two groups according to the amount of monohydrate (calcium oxalate monohydrate group: monohydrate≥90%, calcium oxalate dihydrate group: monohydrate<90%). Significant differences in HU values were detected between the two groups at both energy values (p<0.001).
Conclusions: DECT improved the characterization of urinary stone components and was a useful method for identifying uric acid and calcium oxalate monohydrate stones, which are unsuitable for ESWL.
Keywords: Calcium oxalate; Uric acid; Urinary calculi; X-ray computed tomography.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Evaluation of low-dose dual energy computed tomography for in vivo assessment of renal/ureteric calculus composition.Korean J Urol. 2015 Aug;56(8):587-93. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.8.587. Epub 2015 Aug 10. Korean J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26279828 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Hounsfield Units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition.Urolithiasis. 2015 Feb;43(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0712-x. Epub 2014 Aug 20. Urolithiasis. 2015. PMID: 25139151
-
Stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with solitary pure calcium oxalate stones smaller than 1.0 cm in the proximal ureter, with special reference to monohydrate and dihydrate content.Scand J Urol. 2013 Apr;47(2):131-9. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.711771. Epub 2012 Aug 8. Scand J Urol. 2013. PMID: 22870910
-
Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from non-uric acid calculi: systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2791-2801. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06559-0. Epub 2020 Jan 24. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31980881
-
Radiopacity and hounsfield attenuation of cystine urolithiasis: case series and review of the literature.J Endourol. 2014 Apr;28(4):472-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0524. Epub 2013 Dec 30. J Endourol. 2014. PMID: 24228639 Review.
Cited by
-
The value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in the diagnosis of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies.PeerJ. 2023 Oct 2;11:e16076. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16076. eCollection 2023. PeerJ. 2023. PMID: 37810769 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of pancreatic ductal stone density on non-contrast computed tomography for predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.Endosc Int Open. 2024 Feb 28;12(2):E274-E281. doi: 10.1055/a-2226-1464. eCollection 2024 Feb. Endosc Int Open. 2024. PMID: 38420153 Free PMC article.
-
A New Parameter for Calcium Oxalate Stones: Impact of Linear Calculus Density on Non-Contrast Computed Tomography.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 30;59(2):267. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020267. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 36837469 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of Uric Acid Stones: Mean Stone Density, Stone Heterogeneity Index, and Variation Coefficient of Stone Density by Single-Energy Non-Contrast Computed Tomography and Urinary pH.J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 13;8(2):243. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020243. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 30781839 Free PMC article.
-
Management of upper ureteral stones exceeding 15 mm in diameter: Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.SAGE Open Med. 2016 Dec 20;4:2050312116685180. doi: 10.1177/2050312116685180. eCollection 2016. SAGE Open Med. 2016. PMID: 28348743 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sourtzis S, Thibeau JF, Damry N, Raslan A, Vandendris M, Bellemans M. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:1491–1494. - PubMed
-
- Miller OF, Rineer SK, Reichard SR, Buckley RG, Donovan MS, Graham IR, et al. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Urology. 1998;52:982–987. - PubMed
-
- Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, Ozkaynak C, Karaali K, Kabaalioglu A, et al. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:212–217. - PubMed
-
- Niall O, Russell J, MacGregor R, Duncan H, Mullins J. A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain. J Urol. 1999;161:534–537. - PubMed
-
- Wang JH, Shen SH, Huang SS, Chang CY. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urography in the evaluation of acute renal colic. J Chin Med Assoc. 2008;71:30–36. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical