Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0134549.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134549. eCollection 2015.

Seeing Touches Early in Life

Affiliations

Seeing Touches Early in Life

Margaret Addabbo et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

  • Correction: Seeing Touches Early in Life.
    Addabbo M, Longhi E, Bolognini N, Senna I, Tagliabue P, Macchi Cassia V, Turati C. Addabbo M, et al. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 11;11(3):e0151294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151294. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26967323 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

The sense of touch provides fundamental information about the surrounding world, and feedback about our own actions. Although touch is very important during the earliest stages of life, to date no study has investigated infants' abilities to process visual stimuli implying touch. This study explores the developmental origins of the ability to visually recognize touching gestures involving others. Looking times and orienting responses were measured in a visual preference task, in which participants were simultaneously presented with two videos depicting a touching and a no-touching gesture involving human body parts (face, hand) and/or an object (spoon). In Experiment 1, 2-day-old newborns and 3-month-old infants viewed two videos: in one video a moving hand touched a static face, in the other the moving hand stopped before touching it. Results showed that only 3-month-olds, but not newborns, differentiated the touching from the no-touching gesture, displaying a preference for the former over the latter. To test whether newborns could manifest a preferential visual response when the touched body part is different from the face, in Experiment 2 newborns were presented with touching/no-touching gestures in which a hand or an inanimate object-i.e., a spoon- moved towards a static hand. Newborns were able to discriminate a hand-to-hand touching gesture, but they did not manifest any preference for the object-to-hand touch. The present findings speak in favour of an early ability to visually recognize touching gestures involving the interaction between human body parts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Stimuli and results of Experiment 1.
(a) Frames composing the hand-to-face touching gesture (left) and the no-touching gesture (right) videos. Frames are presented in succession in the direction indicated by the arrow. The two stimuli were presented simultaneously on the screen (b) Newborns’ total looking times (left) and orienting responses (right) towards the touching and no-touching gesture during trial 1 and 2. (c) 3-month-old infants’ total looking times (left) and orienting responses (right) towards the touching and no-touching gesture during trial 1 and 2. Error bars refer to the standard errors of the mean. * = p < .05
Fig 2
Fig 2. Stimuli and results of Experiment 2.
(a) Stimuli and results of the social condition. (a1) Frames composing the hand-to-hand touching gesture (left) and the no-touching gesture (right) videos. Frames are presented in succession in the direction indicated by the arrow. The two stimuli were presented simultaneously on the screen (a2) Newborns’ total looking times (left) and orienting responses (right) towards the touching and no-touching gesture during trial 1 and 2 in the social condition. (b) Stimuli and results of the Non-social condition. (b1) Frames composing the object-to-hand touching gesture (left) and the no-touching gesture (right) videos. (b2) Newborns’ total looking times (left) and orienting responses (right) towards the touching and no-touching gesture during trial 1 and 2 in the Non-social condition. Error bars refer to the standard errors of the mean. * = p < .05

References

    1. Montagu A. Touching: The human significance of the skin. Columbia University Press; 1971.
    1. Field T. Touch. MIT press; 2003.
    1. Hertenstein MJ. Touch: Its communicative functions in infancy. Human Development. 2002; 45: 70–94.
    1. Blakemore SJ, Bristow D, Bird G, Frith C, Ward J. Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision—touch synaesthesia. Brain. 2005; 128: 1571–1583. - PubMed
    1. Bolognini N, Miniussi C, Gallo S, Vallar G. Induction of mirror-touch synaesthesia by increasing somatosensory cortical excitability. CurrentBiology. 2013; 23: R436–7. - PubMed

Publication types