Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;24(2):214-22.
doi: 10.1123/japa.2015-0104. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

Self-Selected Walking Speed is Predictive of Daily Ambulatory Activity in Older Adults

Affiliations

Self-Selected Walking Speed is Predictive of Daily Ambulatory Activity in Older Adults

Addie Middleton et al. J Aging Phys Act. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Daily ambulatory activity is associated with health and functional status in older adults; however, assessment requires multiple days of activity monitoring. The objective of this study was to determine the relative capabilities of self-selected walking speed (SSWS), maximal walking speed (MWS), and walking speed reserve (WSR) to provide insight into daily ambulatory activity (steps per day) in community-dwelling older adults. Sixty-seven older adults completed testing and activity monitoring (age 80.39 [6.73] years). SSWS (R2 = .51), MWS (R2 = .35), and WSR calculated as a ratio (R2 = .06) were significant predictors of daily ambulatory activity in unadjusted linear regression. Cutpoints for participants achieving < 8,000 steps/day were identified for SSWS (≤ 0.97 m/s, 44.2% sensitivity, 95.7% specificity, 10.28 +LR, 0.58 -LR) and MWS (≤ 1.39 m/s, 60.5% sensitivity, 78.3% specificity, 2.79 +LR, 0.50 -LR). SSWS may be a feasible proxy for assessing and monitoring daily ambulatory activity in older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scatter plots of steps per day (vertical axes) by a) self-selected walking speed (SSWS), b) maximal walking speed (MWS), c) walking speed reserve calculated as a difference (MWS – SSWS), d) walking speed reserve calculated as a ratio (MWS/SSWS)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nomograms presenting post-test probabilities for “<8,000 steps per day” when individual a) below cutpoint (positive likelihood ratio) and b) above cutpoint (negative likelihood ratio). Cutpoints: 0.97 m/s for self-selected walking speed (solid line) and 1.39 m/s for maximal walking speed (dashed line)

References

    1. Barreira TV, Brouillette RM, Foil HC, Keller JN, Tudor-Locke C. Comparison of older adults’ steps per day using NL-1000 pedometer and two GT3X+ accelerometer filters. J Aging Phys Act. 2013;21(4):402–416. - PubMed
    1. Bohannon RW. Number of pedometer-assessed steps taken per day by adults: a descriptive meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2007;87(12):1642–1650. - PubMed
    1. Bohannon RW, Williams Andrews A. Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2011;97(3):182–189. - PubMed
    1. Bowden MG, Balasubramanian CK, Behrman AL, Kautz SA. Validation of a speed-based classification system using quantitative measures of walking performance poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(6):672–675. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyer KA, Andriacchi TP, Beaupre GS. The role of physical activity in changes in walking mechanics with age. Gait Posture. 2012;36(1):149–153. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources