Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 15;5(9):e008430.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008430.

Systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations

Affiliations

Systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report physical activity questionnaires in healthy adult populations

Zoë Silsbury et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review evaluated the measurement properties of current self-report physical activity questionnaires (SRPAQs) completed within healthy adult populations.

Design: Two reviewers independently searched seven electronic databases and hand searched for articles investigating measurement properties of a SRPAQ evaluating physical activity over the previous 6 months. Articles published from 1 May 2001 to 4 December 2014 were systematically screened and eligible studies were not limited to English language sources. Articles investigating specific race, gender or socioeconomic populations were excluded.

Results: 10 studies investigating 10 SRPAQs were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and ranged from 'poor' to 'good'. The Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaires and Physical Activity Assessment Tool demonstrated good/excellent test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficient (ICC)=0.76, p<0.0001; r=0.627-0.91; r=0.618, p<0.001, respectively), but variable criterion validity (r=0.67, p<0.0001; r=-0.02-0.43; r=0.392, p<0.01, respectively). The single-item measure showed significant criterion validity against an accelerometer (for moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) k=0.23, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.41; and physical activity ≥10 min bouts 0.39 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.64). Construct validity of the six-point scale and Human Activity Profile varied significantly with age, marital status and presence of comorbidities (p<0.05, <0.01, <0.000 and p<0.05, <0.05, <0.000, respectively). The 1 week Godlin-Shephard recall demonstrated 'moderate' validity with the gold standard measure of accelerometry (r=0.43).

Conclusions: Inconclusive evidence exists. Further investigation of criterion validity of the short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire is required, as it demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability.

Prospero number: CRD42012002484.

Keywords: PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PUBLIC HEALTH; REHABILITATION MEDICINE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram depicting study identification (adapted from Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haskell W, Blair S, Hill J. Physical activity: health outcomes and importance for public health policy. Prev Med 2009;49:280–2. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO—World Health Organisation. Physical activity recommendations for health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press, 2010. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/physical_activity-recommendation... (accessed 27 Feb 2015).
    1. Blair S. Physical inactivity: the biggest public health problem of the 21st century. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:1–2. - PubMed
    1. Wittink H, Engelbert R, Takken T. The dangers of inactivity, exercise and inactivity physiology for the manual therapist. Man Ther 2011;16:209–16. 10.1016/j.math.2011.01.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bize R, Johnson J, Plotnikoff R. Physical activity level and health-related quality of life in the general adult population: a systematic review. Prev Med 2007;45:401–15. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.017 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types