Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0136491.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136491. eCollection 2015.

Multilevel Approach of a 1-Year Program of Dietary and Exercise Interventions on Bone Mineral Content and Density in Metabolic Syndrome--the RESOLVE Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Multilevel Approach of a 1-Year Program of Dietary and Exercise Interventions on Bone Mineral Content and Density in Metabolic Syndrome--the RESOLVE Randomized Controlled Trial

Daniel Courteix et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Weight loss is a public health concern in obesity-related diseases such as metabolic syndrome (MetS). However, restrictive diets might induce bone loss. The nature of exercise and whether exercise with weight loss programs can protect against potential bone mass deficits remains unclear. Moreover, compliance is essential in intervention programs. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effects that modality and exercise compliance have on bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD).

Methods: We investigated 90 individuals with MetS who were recruited for the 1-year RESOLVE trial. Community-dwelling seniors with MetS were randomly assigned into three different modalities of exercise (intensive resistance, intensive endurance, moderate mixed) combined with a restrictive diet. They were compared to 44 healthy controls who did not undergo the intervention.

Results: This intensive lifestyle intervention (15-20 hours of training/week + restrictive diet) resulted in weight loss, body composition changes and health improvements. Baseline BMC and BMD for total body, lumbar spine and femoral neck did not differ between MetS groups and between MetS and controls. Despite changes over time, BMC or BMD did not differ between the three modalities of exercise and when compared with the controls. However, independent of exercise modality, compliant participants increased their BMC and BMD compared with their less compliant peers. Decreases in total body lean mass and negative energy balance significantly and independently contributed to decreases in lumbar spine BMC.

Conclusion: After the one year intervention, differences relating to exercise modalities were not evident. However, compliance with an intensive exercise program resulted in a significantly higher bone mass during energy restriction than non-compliance. Exercise is therefore beneficial to bone in the context of a weight loss program.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00917917.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow chart of participants.
re: moderate-resistance-moderate-endurance; Re: high-Resistance-moderate-endurance; rE: moderate-resistance-high-Endurance.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Changes (360 days) on total body bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD), lumbar spine BMC and BMD and femoral neck BMC and BMD for re, Re and rE groups.
re: moderate-resistance-moderate-endurance; Re: high-Resistance-moderate-endurance; rE: moderate-resistance-high-Endurance. There were no significant differences in BMD and BMC parameters between re, Re and rE participants across the intervention. Participants in the intervention did not have significantly greater or lower bone mass or density development than controls.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Compliance effect (360 days) on total body bone mineral content (BMC), lumbar spine BMC and femoral neck BMC for re, Re and rE groups.
re: moderate-resistance-moderate-endurance; Re: high-Resistance-moderate-endurance; rE: moderate-resistance-high-Endurance. * Compliant participants significantly different from non-compliants (p<0.05). ‡ Non-compliant participants significantly different from controls.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Compliance effect (360 days) on total body bone mineral density (BMD), lumbar spine BMD and femoral neck BMD for re, Re and rE groups.
re: moderate-resistance-moderate-endurance; Re: high-Resistance-moderate-endurance; rE: moderate-resistance-high-Endurance. *Compliant participants significantly different from non-compliants (p<0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pedersen SD (2013) Metabolic complications of obesity. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 27: 179–193. 10.1016/j.beem.2013.02.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shapses SA, Riedt CS (2006) Bone, body weight, and weight reduction: what are the concerns? J Nutr 136: 1453–1456. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hinton PS, LeCheminant JD, Smith BK, Rector RS, Donnelly JE (2009) Weight loss-induced alterations in serum markers of bone turnover persist during weight maintenance in obese men and women. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 28: 565–573. - PubMed
    1. Sukumar D, Ambia-Sobhan H, Zurfluh R, Schlussel Y, Stahl TJ, Gordon CL, et al. (2011) Areal and volumetric bone mineral density and geometry at two levels of protein intake during caloric restriction: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 26: 1339–1348. 10.1002/jbmr.318 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Redman LM, Rood J, Anton SD, Champagne C, Smith SR, Ravussin E (2008) Calorie restriction and bone health in young, overweight individuals. Archives of Internal Medicine 168: 1859–1866. 10.1001/archinte.168.17.1859 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data