Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;58 Suppl(Suppl):S211-S218.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Sep 14.

Textual inference for eligibility criteria resolution in clinical trials

Affiliations

Textual inference for eligibility criteria resolution in clinical trials

Chaitanya Shivade et al. J Biomed Inform. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Clinical trials are essential for determining whether new interventions are effective. In order to determine the eligibility of patients to enroll into these trials, clinical trial coordinators often perform a manual review of clinical notes in the electronic health record of patients. This is a very time-consuming and exhausting task. Efforts in this process can be expedited if these coordinators are directed toward specific parts of the text that are relevant for eligibility determination. In this study, we describe the creation of a dataset that can be used to evaluate automated methods capable of identifying sentences in a note that are relevant for screening a patient's eligibility in clinical trials. Using this dataset, we also present results for four simple methods in natural language processing that can be used to automate this task. We found that this is a challenging task (maximum F-score=26.25), but it is a promising direction for further research.

Keywords: Clinical trials; Electronic health records; Natural language processing; Textual inference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Criterion selection screen Working screeen for note annotation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Penberthy L, Brown R, Puma F, Dahman B. Automated matching software for clinical trials eligibility: measuring efficiency and flexibility. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010;31:207–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.03.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joseph G, Dohan D. Recruiting minorities where they receive care: Institutional barriers to cancer clinical trials recruitment in a safety-net hospital. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30:552–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.06.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Penberthy LT, Dahman BA, Petkov VI, DeShazo JP. Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8:365–70. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000646. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenbloom ST, Denny JC, Xu H, Lorenzi N, Stead WW, Johnson KB. Data from clinical notes: a perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 18:181–6. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.007237. n.d. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Köpcke F, Trinczek B, Majeed RW, Schreiweis B, Wenk J, Leusch T, et al. Evaluation of data completeness in the electronic health record for the purpose of patient recruitment into clinical trials: a retrospective analysis of element presence. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-37. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms