Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 17:21:2767-73.
doi: 10.12659/MSM.893718.

Cochlear Function Monitoring after Spinal Anesthesia

Agata Janecka-Placek  1 , Grażyna Lisowska  2 , Andrzej Paradysz  3 , Hanna Misiołek  1
Affiliations

Cochlear Function Monitoring after Spinal Anesthesia

Agata Janecka-Placek et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to examine the effect of spinal anesthesia on the function of cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs), determined by means of objective distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) testing. To the best of our knowledge, our study was the second OAE-based analysis of cochlear function during spinal anesthesia, and the only experiment including such a large group of patients.

Material and methods: The study included 20 patients (18 men and 2 women) subjected to a scheduled uretherorenoscopic lithotripsy with routine spinal anesthesia with 10 mg (2 ml) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 50 μg (1 ml) of fentanyl. The levels of DPOAEs and background noise at 1000-6000 Hz were recorded prior to and immediately after the anesthesia, and on the postoperative day 2.

Results: We did not find significant differences between DPOAEs values recorded prior to and immediately after the anesthesia. The only exception pertained to 5652 Hz, at which a significantly higher level of DPOAEs was observed immediately after the anesthesia. The levels of DPOAEs at 2002 Hz and 2380 Hz collected on the postoperative day 2 were significantly higher than the respective baseline values. Irrespective of the frequency and time of testing, we did not find any significant differences between the recorded levels of background noise.

Conclusions: Our findings point to the lack of a detrimental effect of spinal anesthesia on objectively evaluated cochlear function, and thus suggest that this method is safe, even for OHCs, which are extremely susceptible to exogenous and endogenous injuries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Levels of DPOAEs and background noise documented prior to (recording 0, circles) and immediately after the anesthesia (recording 1, squares). Significant differences at * p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01, and *** p≤0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Levels of DPOAEs and background noise documented prior to (recording 0, circles) and on the postoperative day 2 (recording 2, squares). Significant differences at * p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01, and *** p≤0.001.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Duniec L, Nowakowski P, Kosson D, Łazowski T. Anatomical landmarks based assessment of intravertebral space level for lumbar puncture is misleading in more than 30% Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2013;45:1–6. - PubMed
    1. Panning B, Mehler D, Lehnhardt E. Transient low-frequency hypoacousia after spinal anaesthesia. Lancet. 1983;2:582. - PubMed
    1. Cosar A, Yetiser S, Sizlan A, Yanarates O, Yildirim A. Hearing impairment associated with spinal anesthesia. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004;124:1159–64. - PubMed
    1. Karatas E, Goksu S, Durucu C, et al. Evaluation of hearing loss after spinal anesthesia with otoacoustic emissions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263:705–10. - PubMed
    1. Yildiz TS, Solak M, Iseri M, et al. Hearing loss after spinal anesthesia: the effect of different infusion solutions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137:79–82. - PubMed

MeSH terms