. 2015 Sep 16:13:224.

doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6.

A scoping review of rapid review methods

Andrea C Tricco^{1

2}, Jesmin Antony³, Wasifa Zarin⁴, Lisa Strifler^{5

6}, Marco Ghassemi⁷, John Ivory⁸, Laure Perrier⁹, Brian Hutton¹⁰, David Moher¹¹, Sharon E Straus^{12

13}

Affiliations

¹ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. TriccoA@smh.ca.
² Epidemiology Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 6th Floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3 M7, Canada. TriccoA@smh.ca.
³ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. AntonyJ@smh.ca.
⁴ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. ZarinW@smh.ca.
⁵ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. StriflerL@smh.ca.
⁶ Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 4th Floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3 M6, Canada. StriflerL@smh.ca.
⁷ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. marco.m.ghassemi@gmail.com.
⁸ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. john.d.ivory@gmail.com.
⁹ Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 4th Floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3 M6, Canada. l.perrier@utoronto.ca.
¹⁰ Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada. bhutton@ohri.ca.
¹¹ Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada. dmoher@ohri.ca.
¹² Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. sharon.straus@utoronto.ca.
¹³ Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1, Canada. sharon.straus@utoronto.ca.

PMID: 26377409
PMCID: PMC4574114
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6

A scoping review of rapid review methods

Andrea C Tricco et al. BMC Med. 2015.

. 2015 Sep 16:13:224.

doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6.

Authors

Andrea C Tricco^{1

2}, Jesmin Antony³, Wasifa Zarin⁴, Lisa Strifler^{5

6}, Marco Ghassemi⁷, John Ivory⁸, Laure Perrier⁹, Brian Hutton¹⁰, David Moher¹¹, Sharon E Straus^{12

13}

Affiliations

¹ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. TriccoA@smh.ca.
² Epidemiology Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 6th Floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3 M7, Canada. TriccoA@smh.ca.
³ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. AntonyJ@smh.ca.
⁴ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. ZarinW@smh.ca.
⁵ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. StriflerL@smh.ca.
⁶ Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 4th Floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3 M6, Canada. StriflerL@smh.ca.
⁷ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. marco.m.ghassemi@gmail.com.
⁸ Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. john.d.ivory@gmail.com.
⁹ Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 4th Floor, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3 M6, Canada. l.perrier@utoronto.ca.
¹⁰ Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada. bhutton@ohri.ca.
¹¹ Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada. dmoher@ohri.ca.
¹² Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Room 716, Toronto, ON, M5B 1 W8, Canada. sharon.straus@utoronto.ca.
¹³ Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1, Canada. sharon.straus@utoronto.ca.

PMID: 26377409
PMCID: PMC4574114
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6

Abstract

Background: Rapid reviews are a form of knowledge synthesis in which components of the systematic review process are simplified or omitted to produce information in a timely manner. Although numerous centers are conducting rapid reviews internationally, few studies have examined the methodological characteristics of rapid reviews. We aimed to examine articles, books, and reports that evaluated, compared, used or described rapid reviews or methods through a scoping review.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, internet websites of rapid review producers, and reference lists were searched to identify articles for inclusion. Two reviewers independently screened literature search results and abstracted data from included studies. Descriptive analysis was conducted.

Results: We included 100 articles plus one companion report that were published between 1997 and 2013. The studies were categorized as 84 application papers, seven development papers, six impact papers, and four comparison papers (one was included in two categories). The rapid reviews were conducted between 1 and 12 months, predominantly in Europe (58 %) and North America (20 %). The included studies failed to report 6 % to 73 % of the specific systematic review steps examined. Fifty unique rapid review methods were identified; 16 methods occurred more than once. Streamlined methods that were used in the 82 rapid reviews included limiting the literature search to published literature (24 %) or one database (2 %), limiting inclusion criteria by date (68 %) or language (49 %), having one person screen and another verify or screen excluded studies (6 %), having one person abstract data and another verify (23 %), not conducting risk of bias/quality appraisal (7 %) or having only one reviewer conduct the quality appraisal (7 %), and presenting results as a narrative summary (78 %). Four case studies were identified that compared the results of rapid reviews to systematic reviews. Three studies found that the conclusions between rapid reviews and systematic reviews were congruent.

Conclusions: Numerous rapid review approaches were identified and few were used consistently in the literature. Poor quality of reporting was observed. A prospective study comparing the results from rapid reviews to those obtained through systematic reviews is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

**Fig. 2**
Word cloud for the frequency of terms

**Fig. 3**
Citation analysis. *Twenty-six papers referenced another seminal paper to establish their rapid review framework

**Fig. 4**
Streamlined steps used across the rapid reviews (n = 82 studies reporting this information). SR, systematic review

See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

1. Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Moher D. The art and science of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.007. - DOI - PubMed
1. Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, Grimshaw J, Moher D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1:10. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Higgins JPT. Green S (Eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011) Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
1. Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Co.; 2006.
1. Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992;268:240–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490020088036. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
- scite Smart Citations

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

A scoping review of rapid review methods

Affiliations

A scoping review of rapid review methods

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Figures

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources