Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016;26(1):99-119.
doi: 10.1080/10543406.2015.1092034.

Methods for identification and confirmation of targeted subgroups in clinical trials: A systematic review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Methods for identification and confirmation of targeted subgroups in clinical trials: A systematic review

Thomas Ondra et al. J Biopharm Stat. 2016.

Abstract

Important objectives in the development of stratified medicines include the identification and confirmation of subgroups of patients with a beneficial treatment effect and a positive benefit-risk balance. We report the results of a literature review on methodological approaches to the design and analysis of clinical trials investigating a potential heterogeneity of treatment effects across subgroups. The identified approaches are classified based on certain characteristics of the proposed trial designs and analysis methods. We distinguish between exploratory and confirmatory subgroup analysis, frequentist, Bayesian and decision-theoretic approaches and, last, fixed-sample, group-sequential, and adaptive designs and illustrate the available trial designs and analysis strategies with published case studies.

Keywords: Enrichment design; personalized medicine; precision medicine; predictive biomarkers; subgroup identification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of selected manuscripts.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overview of single-stage clinical trial designs. Τ is the experimental treatment, С is the control treatment. Solid lines indicate deterministic decisions whereat dashed lines indicate that a randomization procedure is involved.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Adaptive multi-stage design.

References

    1. Almirall D., Compton S.N., Gunlicks-Stoessel M., Duan N., Murphy S.A. Designing a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategy. Statistics in Medicine. 2012;31:1887–1902. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alosh M., Huque M.F. A flexible strategy for testing subgroups and overall population. Statistics in Medicine. 2009;28:3–23. - PubMed
    1. Alosh M., Huque M.F. Multiplicity considerations for subgroup analysis subject to consistency constraint: Multiplicity considerations for subgroup analysis. Biometrical Journal. 2013;55:444–462. - PubMed
    1. Altstein L.L., Li G., Elashoff R.M. A method to estimate treatment efficacy among latent subgroups of a randomized clinical trial. Statistics in Medicine. 2011;30:709–717. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bang Y.J., Van Cutsem E., Feyereislova A., Chung H.C., Shen L., Sawaki A., Lordick F., Ohtsu A., Omuro Y., Satoh T., Aprile G., Kulikov E., Hill J., Lehle M., Rüschoff J., Kang Y.K. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of her2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (toga): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2010;367:687–698. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources