To Share or Not to Share? A Survey of Biomedical Researchers in the U.S. Southwest, an Ethnically Diverse Region
- PMID: 26378445
- PMCID: PMC4574947
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138239
To Share or Not to Share? A Survey of Biomedical Researchers in the U.S. Southwest, an Ethnically Diverse Region
Abstract
Background: Cancer health disparities research depends on access to biospecimens from diverse racial/ethnic populations. This multimethodological study, using mixed methods for quantitative and qualitative analysis of survey results, assessed barriers, concerns, and practices for sharing biospecimens/data among researchers working with biospecimens from minority populations in a 5 state region of the United States (Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas). The ultimate goals of this research were to understand data sharing barriers among biomedical researchers; guide strategies to increase participation in biospecimen research; and strengthen collaborative opportunities among researchers.
Methods and population: Email invitations to anonymous participants (n = 605 individuals identified by the NIH RePORT database), resulted in 112 responses. The survey assessed demographics, specimen collection data, and attitudes about virtual biorepositories. Respondents were primarily principal investigators at PhD granting institutions (91.1%) conducting basic (62.3%) research; most were non-Hispanic White (63.4%) and men (60.6%). The low response rate limited the statistical power of the analyses, further the number of respondents for each survey question was variable.
Results: Findings from this study identified barriers to biospecimen research, including lack of access to sufficient biospecimens, and limited availability of diverse tissue samples. Many of these barriers can be attributed to poor annotation of biospecimens, and researchers' unwillingness to share existing collections. Addressing these barriers to accessing biospecimens is essential to combating cancer in general and cancer health disparities in particular. This study confirmed researchers' willingness to participate in a virtual biorepository (n = 50 respondents agreed). However, researchers in this region listed clear specifications for establishing and using such a biorepository: specifications related to standardized procedures, funding, and protections of human subjects and intellectual property. The results help guide strategies to increase data sharing behaviors and to increase participation of researchers with multiethnic biospecimen collections in collaborative research endeavors.
Conclusions: Data sharing by researchers is essential to leveraging knowledge and resources needed for the advancement of research on cancer health disparities. Although U.S. funding entities have guidelines for data and resource sharing, future efforts should address researcher preferences in order to promote collaboration to address cancer health disparities.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Investigator Experiences and Attitudes About Research With Biospecimens.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Dec;10(5):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1556264615610199. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015. PMID: 26564943 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to qualitative data sharing in the United States: A survey of qualitative researchers.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 31;16(12):e0261719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261719. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34972126 Free PMC article.
-
Health researchers' experiences, perceptions and barriers related to sharing study results with participants.Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 4;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0422-5. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019. PMID: 30832733 Free PMC article.
-
The Future of Biobanking: A Conceptual Look at How Biobanks Can Respond to the Growing Human Biospecimen Needs of Researchers.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;864:11-27. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20579-3_2. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015. PMID: 26420610 Review.
-
Developing an institutional cancer biorepository for personalized medicine.Clin Biochem. 2014 Mar;47(4-5):293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.12.015. Epub 2013 Dec 27. Clin Biochem. 2014. PMID: 24373923 Review.
Cited by
-
Data sharing through an NIH central database repository: a cross-sectional survey of BioLINCC users.BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 26;6(9):e012769. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012769. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27670522 Free PMC article.
-
Biodiversity data supports research on human infectious diseases: Global trends, challenges, and opportunities.One Health. 2023 Jan 18;16:100484. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100484. eCollection 2023 Jun. One Health. 2023. PMID: 36714536 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sharing, reuse, and storage of biosamples among biomedical researchers in Jordan: Practice and concerns.PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267552. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35482729 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the Secondary Use of Clinical Research Data: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 6;12:e44875. doi: 10.2196/44875. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023. PMID: 36877564 Free PMC article.
-
BEYOND LEGAL FRAMEWORKS AND SECURITY CONTROLS FOR ACCESSING CONFIDENTIAL SURVEY DATA IN THE UNITED STATES: ENGAGING DATA USERS IN DATA PROTECTION.J Priv Confid. 2023;13(2):10.29012/jpc.845. doi: 10.29012/jpc.845. Epub 2023 Dec 6. J Priv Confid. 2023. PMID: 38550525 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources