In Response
- PMID: 26378711
- DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000827
In Response
Comment on
-
Positive end-expiratory pressure to increase internal jugular vein size is poorly tolerated in obese anesthetized adults.Anesth Analg. 2014 Sep;119(3):619-621. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000347. Anesth Analg. 2014. PMID: 25137000
-
Randomization in a Crossover Design Is Not to Be a Minor Issue.Anesth Analg. 2015 Oct;121(4):1112. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000833. Anesth Analg. 2015. PMID: 26378710 No abstract available.
References
-
- Apiliogullari S, Onal O. Randomization in a crossover design is not to be a minor issue. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:1112
-
- Downey LA, Blaine KP, Sliwa J, Macario A, Brock-Utne J. Positive end-expiratory pressure to increase internal jugular vein size is poorly tolerated in obese anesthetized adults. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:619–21
-
- Hollenbeck KJ, Vander Schuur BM, Tulis MR, Mecklenburg BW, Gaconnet CP, Wallace SC, Lujan E, Lesnik IK. Brief report: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on internal jugular vein cross-sectional area in anesthetized adults. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:1669–73
-
- Marcus HE, Bonkat E, Dagtekin O, Schier R, Petzke F, Wippermann J, Böttiger BW, Teschendorf P. The impact of Trendelenburg position and positive end-expiratory pressure on the internal jugular cross-sectional area. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:432–6
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
