Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138543.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138543. eCollection 2015.

Reliability and Validity of Selected PROMIS Measures in People with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Susan J Bartlett  1 , Ana-Maria Orbai  2 , Trisha Duncan  2 , Elaine DeLeon  2 , Victoria Ruffing  2 , Katherine Clegg-Smith  3 , Clifton O Bingham 3rd  2
Affiliations
Observational Study

Reliability and Validity of Selected PROMIS Measures in People with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Susan J Bartlett et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and validity of 11 PROMIS measures to assess symptoms and impacts identified as important by people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: Consecutive patients (N = 177) in an observational study completed PROMIS computer adapted tests (CATs) and a short form (SF) assessing pain, fatigue, physical function, mood, sleep, and participation. We assessed test-test reliability and internal consistency using correlation and Cronbach's alpha. We assessed convergent validity by examining Pearson correlations between PROMIS measures and existing measures of similar domains and known groups validity by comparing scores across disease activity levels using ANOVA.

Results: Participants were mostly female (82%) and white (83%) with mean (SD) age of 56 (13) years; 24% had ≤ high school, 29% had RA ≤ 5 years with 13% ≤ 2 years, and 22% were disabled. PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference and Fatigue instruments correlated moderately to strongly (rho's ≥ 0.68) with corresponding PROs. Test-retest reliability ranged from .725-.883, and Cronbach's alpha from .906-.991. A dose-response relationship with disease activity was evident in Physical Function with similar trends in other scales except Anger.

Conclusions: These data provide preliminary evidence of reliability and construct validity of PROMIS CATs to assess RA symptoms and impacts, and feasibility of use in clinical care. PROMIS instruments captured the experiences of RA patients across the broad continuum of RA symptoms and function, especially at low disease activity levels. Future research is needed to evaluate performance in relevant subgroups, assess responsiveness and identify clinically meaningful changes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Distribution of PROMIS and legacy scores in rheumatoid arthritis sample (N = 177).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1583–4. doi: 307/15/1583 [pii]; 10.1001/jama.2012.500 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santana MJ, Haverman L, Absolom K, Takeuchi E, Feeny D, Grootenhuis M, et al. Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice. Qual Life Res. 2015. 10.1007/s11136-014-0903-5 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Federal Register. 2009;74(235):65132–3.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults—United States, 2005. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2009;58(16):421–6. . - PubMed
    1. Hootman JM, Helmick CG. Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2006;54(1):226–9. 10.1002/art.21562 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types