Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep 15;7(9):141-7.
doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i9.141.

Proton therapy for pancreatic cancer

Affiliations
Review

Proton therapy for pancreatic cancer

Romaine C Nichols et al. World J Gastrointest Oncol. .

Abstract

Radiotherapy is commonly offered to patients with pancreatic malignancies although its ultimate utility is compromised since the pancreas is surrounded by exquisitely radiosensitive normal tissues, such as the duodenum, stomach, jejunum, liver, and kidneys. Proton radiotherapy can be used to create dose distributions that conform to tumor targets with significant normal tissue sparing. Because of this, protons appear to represent a superior modality for radiotherapy delivery to patients with unresectable tumors and those receiving postoperative radiotherapy. A particularly exciting opportunity for protons also exists for patients with resectable and marginally resectable disease. In this paper, we review the current literature on proton therapy for pancreatic cancer and discuss scenarios wherein the improvement in the therapeutic index with protons may have the potential to change the management paradigm for this malignancy.

Keywords: Pancreatic cancer; Proton therapy; Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Charged particles like protons travel a finite distance into tissue, as determined by their energy, and then release that energy in a tightly defined region called “Bragg peak” (A). By delivering a range of energies toward the tumor target, a summation of these Bragg peaks allow for the creation of a “spread-out Bragg peak”, which conforms to the depth and position of the tumor target (B). Image borrowed from the University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute.
Figure 2
Figure 2
With X-rays, the tumor dose is significantly less than the entry dose and exit dose is delivered beyond the tumor target. With conventional radiotherapy (A) using X-rays (photons), the highest dose is near the point of beam entry into the patient. The tumor dose is significantly less than the entry dose. Also, an exit dose is delivered beyond the tumor target. With protons (B) and other particle therapies, such as carbon ions, the entry dose is low. The highest dose is at the depth of the tumor target and there is no exit dose beyond the target. Image borrowed from the University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A passively scattered proton plan is shown on the left and an intensity-modulated X-ray therapy plan is shown on the right for a typical patient receiving postoperative radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer. To achieve a conformal dose distribution, the intensity-modulated X-ray therapy plan delivers beams from multiple angles and necessarily irradiates the entire cylinder of the abdomen. With protons, however, because the dose distribution can be modulated along the beam path, significant sparing of sensitive gastrointestinal structures (small bowel and stomach) can be achieved. In the proton plan, 75% of the dose is delivered via a posterior field that irradiates the tumor bed but does not exit into the small bowel. The remaining dose is delivered through a right lateral field that also irradiates the tumor bed but does not exit into the stomach.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall survival and freedom from local progression at 2 years for 11 patients accrued to a phase II clinical trial for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Image borrowed from Ref. [19].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paganetti H. Proton Therapy Physics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press;; 2011.
    1. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, Bassi C, Dunn JA, Hickey H, Beger H, Fernandez-Cruz L, Dervenis C, Lacaine F, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1200–1210. - PubMed
    1. Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD, Almond J, Link K, Beger H, Bassi C, Falconi M, Pederzoli P, Dervenis C, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358:1576–1585. - PubMed
    1. Abrams RA, Lillemoe KD, Piantadosi S. Continuing controversy over adjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2001;358:1565–1566. - PubMed
    1. Hammel P, Huguet F, Van Laethem JL. Comparison of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy (CT) in patients with a locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) controlled after 4 months of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib: Final results of the international phase III LAP 07 study [abstract] J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:LBA4003a.