Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;25(7):550-556.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12357. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

Fracture Load Before and After Veneering Zirconia Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses

Affiliations

Fracture Load Before and After Veneering Zirconia Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses

Verónica Rodríguez et al. J Prosthodont. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the fracture load of 3-unit zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) before and after veneering the frameworks.

Materials and methods: Forty standardized stainless-steel master dies were fabricated (height: 5 mm, convergence: 6º, chamfer: 1 mm) and randomly screwed in pairs onto metal bases. The bases were randomly divided into two groups (n = 20 each) according to the zirconia CAD/CAM system used for constructing 3-unit structures for FDPs: group 1 (L): Lava All-ceramic, group 2 (Z): IPS e.max ZirCAD. Half of the zirconia structures per group were randomly selected and veneered, while the remaining half was left unveneered. The specimens were luted in standard fashion onto the stainless steel master dies using conventional glass ionomer cement. All specimens were tested for fracture load (FL). Specimens were subjected to a three-point bending test until fracture by applying an axial compressive load at the central fossa of the pontics with a universal testing machine at a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. Wilcoxon's rank-sum test and Weibull statistics were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).

Results: L structures recorded significantly higher values of load to fracture than the Z group both before and after veneering. Within each ceramic group, no differences were found between unveneered and veneered frameworks.

Conclusions: Although further studies are necessary to corroborate these findings, both zirconia systems could be recommended for restoring posterior teeth on the basis of the fracture load values recorded in this experiment (>1000 N). The veneering procedure did not affect the overall load to fracture in any group.

Keywords: CAD/CAM; FDPs; dental framework, ceramic veneering; fracture load; zirconia ceramic.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources