Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 18:4:e08789.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.08789.

Modulation of GABA and resting state functional connectivity by transcranial direct current stimulation

Affiliations

Modulation of GABA and resting state functional connectivity by transcranial direct current stimulation

Velicia Bachtiar et al. Elife. .

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that network level functional connectivity in the human brain could be related to levels of inhibition in a major network node at baseline (Stagg et al., 2014). In this study, we build upon this finding to directly investigate the effects of perturbing M1 GABA and resting state functional connectivity using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a neuromodulatory approach that has previously been demonstrated to modulate both metrics. FMRI data and GABA levels, as assessed by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, were measured before and after 20 min of 1 mA anodal or sham tDCS. In line with previous studies, baseline GABA levels were negatively correlated with the strength of functional connectivity within the resting motor network. However, although we confirm the previously reported findings that anodal tDCS reduces GABA concentration and increases functional connectivity in the stimulated motor cortex; these changes are not correlated, suggesting they may be driven by distinct underlying mechanisms.

Keywords: GABA; brain stimulation; functional connectivity; human; neuroscience; plasticity; resting state networks; tDCS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

HJ-B: Reviewing editor, eLife.

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Experimental design.
All subjects participated in two testing sessions with either anodal or sham tDCS, the order of which was counterbalanced across the group. GABA was measured at three time points (baseline, during, post) and resting state connectivity was measured at two time points (baseline, post). Timeline shown is an estimate of the length of the scans in minutes. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08789.002
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Representative (A) MR spectrum and (B) Group mean motor resting state network.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08789.003
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. A significant relationship between M1-GABA and the strength of the motor network measured from the same region was identified at baseline (r = −0.62, p < 0.01).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08789.004
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Change in GABA before, during, and after anodal tDCS relative to the sham condition.
(A) Gradual decrease in GABA levels was observed during anodal stimulation with the most prominent decrease approximately 10–15 min after stimulation has finished (Post1). Break in the lines indicate a time gap when approximately 7 min of resting state acquisition was performed immediately after tDCS stimulation. Timescale shows the approximate time from the beginning of the scan session. (Post 1: t(11) = −4.14, p < 0.01; Post 2: t(11) = −2.86, p = 0.02). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08789.005
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Change in functional connectivity before and after Anodal tDCS and the Sham condition.
(A) Anodal tDCS applied to M1, significantly increased functional connectivity within M1 of the motor network (t (11) = −2.45, p = 0.03). (B) There were no differences in the sham condition (t(11) = 0.07, p = 0.95). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08789.006
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. No significant relationship was demonstrated between GABA levels after tDCS and the strength of the motor network.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08789.007

References

    1. Albert NB, Robertson EM, Miall RC. The resting human brain and motor learning. Current Biology. 2009;19:1023–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.04.028. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amadi U, Ilie AS, Johansen-Berg H, Stagg CJ. Polarity-specific effects of motor transcranial direct current stimulation on fMRI resting state networks. Neuroimage. 2014;88:155–161. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beckmann CF, DeLuca M, Devlin JT, Smith SM. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2005;360:1001–1013. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1634. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cabral J, Hugues E, Sporns O, Deco G. Role of local network oscillations in resting-state functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2011;57:130–139. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cousijn H, Haegens S, Wallis G, Near J, Stokes MG, Harrison PJ, Nobre AC. Resting GABA and glutamate concentrations do not predict visual gamma frequency or amplitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2014;111:9301–9306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321072111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources