Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 17:16:125.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0337-3.

What research agenda could be generated from the European General Practice Research Network concept of Multimorbidity in Family Practice?

J Y Le Reste  1 , P Nabbe  2 , H Lingner  3 , D Kasuba Lazic  4 , R Assenova  5 , M Munoz  6 , A Sowinska  7 , C Lygidakis  8 , C Doerr  9 , S Czachowski  10 , S Argyriadou  11 , J Valderas  12 , B Le Floch  13 , J Deriennic  14 , T Jan  15 , E Melot  16 , P Barraine  17 , M Odorico  18 , C Lietard  19 , P Van Royen  20 , H Van Marwijk  21
Affiliations

What research agenda could be generated from the European General Practice Research Network concept of Multimorbidity in Family Practice?

J Y Le Reste et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity is an intuitively appealing, yet challenging, concept for Family Medicine (FM). An EGPRN working group has published a comprehensive definition of the concept based on a systematic review of the literature which is closely linked to patient complexity and to the biopsychosocial model. This concept was identified by European Family Physicians (FPs) throughout Europe using 13 qualitative surveys. To further our understanding of the issues around multimorbidity, we needed to do innovative research to clarify this concept. The research question for this survey was: what research agenda could be generated for Family Medicine from the EGPRN concept of Multimorbidity?

Methods: Nominal group design with a purposive panel of experts in the field of multimorbidity. The nominal group worked through four phases: ideas generation phase, ideas recording phase, evaluation and analysis phase and a prioritization phase.

Results: Fifteen international experts participated. A research agenda was established, featuring 6 topics and 11 themes with their corresponding study designs. The highest priorities were given to the following topics: measuring multimorbidity and the impact of multimorbidity. In addition the experts stressed that the concept should be simplified. This would be best achieved by working in reverse: starting with the outcomes and working back to find the useful variables within the concept.

Conclusion: The highest priority for future research on multimorbidity should be given to measuring multimorbidity and to simplifying the EGPRN model, using a pragmatic approach to determine the useful variables within the concept from its outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Lapointe L. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:223–8. doi: 10.1370/afm.272. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brandlmeier P. Multimorbidity among elderly patients in an urban general practice. ZFA. 1976;52:1269–75. - PubMed
    1. Starfield B. Global health, equity, and primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20:511–3. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.06.070176. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beasley JW, Starfield B, van Weel C, Rosser WW, Haq CL. Global health and primary care research. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20(6):518–26. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.06.070172. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyd CM, Shadmi E, Conwell LJ, Griswold M, Leff B, Brager R, et al. A pilot test of the effect of guided care on the quality of primary care experiences for multimorbid older adults. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(5):536–42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0529-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources