Do Angry Birds Make for Angry Children? A Meta-Analysis of Video Game Influences on Children's and Adolescents' Aggression, Mental Health, Prosocial Behavior, and Academic Performance
- PMID: 26386002
- DOI: 10.1177/1745691615592234
Do Angry Birds Make for Angry Children? A Meta-Analysis of Video Game Influences on Children's and Adolescents' Aggression, Mental Health, Prosocial Behavior, and Academic Performance
Abstract
The issue of whether video games-violent or nonviolent-"harm" children and adolescents continues to be hotly contested in the scientific community, among politicians, and in the general public. To date, researchers have focused on college student samples in most studies on video games, often with poorly standardized outcome measures. To answer questions about harm to minors, these studies are arguably not very illuminating. In the current analysis, I sought to address this gap by focusing on studies of video game influences on child and adolescent samples. The effects of overall video game use and exposure to violent video games specifically were considered, although this was not an analysis of pathological game use. Overall, results from 101 studies suggest that video game influences on increased aggression (r = .06), reduced prosocial behavior (r = .04), reduced academic performance (r = -.01), depressive symptoms (r = .04), and attention deficit symptoms (r = .03) are minimal. Issues related to researchers' degrees of freedom and citation bias also continue to be common problems for the field. Publication bias remains a problem for studies of aggression. Recommendations are given on how research may be improved and how the psychological community should address video games from a public health perspective.
Keywords: academics; aggression; mental health; prosocial behavior; video games.
© The Author(s) 2015.
Comment in
-
Finding the Middle Ground in Violent Video Game Research: Lessons From Ferguson (2015).Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;10(5):667-70. doi: 10.1177/1745691615592236. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26386003
-
Video Games Do Indeed Influence Children and Adolescents' Aggression, Prosocial Behavior, and Academic Performance: A Clearer Reading of Ferguson (2015).Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;10(5):671-3. doi: 10.1177/1745691615592239. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26386004
-
What Is a Good Skeptic to Do? The Case for Skepticism in the Media Violence Discussion.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;10(5):674-6. doi: 10.1177/1745691615592238. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26386005
-
Methodological and Reporting Errors in Meta-Analytic Reviews Make Other Meta-Analysts Angry: A Commentary on Ferguson (2015).Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;10(5):677-9. doi: 10.1177/1745691615592235. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26386006
-
The Limited Informativeness of Meta-Analyses of Media Effects.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;10(5):680-2. doi: 10.1177/1745691615592237. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26386007
-
Pay No Attention to That Data Behind the Curtain: On Angry Birds, Happy Children, Scholarly Squabbles, Publication Bias, and Why Betas Rule Metas.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Sep;10(5):683-91. doi: 10.1177/1745691615593353. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26386008
-
Angry Birds, Angry Children, and Angry Meta-Analysts: A Reanalysis.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 May;11(3):408-14. doi: 10.1177/1745691616635599. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27217253
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
