Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;93(2):139-44.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.08.018. Epub 2015 Sep 16.

Changes in out-of-pocket costs for hormonal IUDs after implementation of the Affordable Care Act: an analysis of insurance benefit inquiries

Affiliations

Changes in out-of-pocket costs for hormonal IUDs after implementation of the Affordable Care Act: an analysis of insurance benefit inquiries

Jonathan M Bearak et al. Contraception. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires that privately insured women can obtain contraceptive services and supplies without cost sharing. This may substantially affect women who prefer an intrauterine device (IUD), a long-acting reversible contraceptive, because of high upfront costs that they would otherwise face. However, imperfect enforcement of and exceptions to this provision could limit its effect.

Study design: We analyzed administrative data for 417,221 women whose physicians queried their insurance plans from January 2012 to March 2014 to determine whether each woman had insurance coverage for a hormonal IUD and the extent of that coverage.

Results: In January 2012, 58% of women would have incurred out-of-pocket costs for an IUD, compared to only 13% of women in March 2014. Differentials by age and region virtually dissolved over the period studied, which suggests that the ACA reduced inequality among insured women.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the cost of hormonal IUDs fell to US$0 for most insured women following the implementation of the ACA.

Implications: Financial barriers to one of the most effective methods of contraception fell substantially following the ACA. If more women interested in this method can access it, this may contribute to a decline in unintended pregnancies in the United States.

Keywords: Contraception; Healthcare reform; IUD; Insurance; LARC; Out-of-pocket costs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percentage of women who would have had out-of-pocket costs for a hormonal IUD, by month. Note: The lighter line begins in January 2013 because the 2012 data do not contain insertion copayments and deductible applicability.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
In each age group: percentage of women who would have had out-of-pocket costs for a hormonal IUD, by quarter.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
In each region: percentage of women would have had out-of-pocket costs for a hormonal IUD, by quarter.

References

    1. Daniels K, Daugherty J, Jones J. Current Contraceptive Status Among Women Aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013. NCHS Data Brief; 20141-8. - PubMed
    1. Contraceptive Use in the United States. at http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_contr_use.html#2.
    1. Kavanaugh M, Jerman J, Finer L. Changes in use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among United States women. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;83:2009–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. 2011;83:397–404. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trussell J, Lalla A, Doan Q, Reyes E. Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception. 2009;79(1):5–4. at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782408004101. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources