Perspectives on a Multidisciplinary Team Approach to Implementation of Planned Emergent Use Research
- PMID: 26386913
- PMCID: PMC4581686
- DOI: 10.12659/MSM.894327
Perspectives on a Multidisciplinary Team Approach to Implementation of Planned Emergent Use Research
Abstract
In this paper we present the viewpoints of three members of a research team, on the approach to teamwork in the development of an emergent use clinical trial when dealing with diversity of opinions, in order to facilitate stakeholder buy-in. We also discuss a specific approach to the coordination of the team members, which in our opinion had a positive impact on the implementation of the project. We also comment on the influence of the team organization in the timeline and completion of a clinical trial. We hope to start a conversation on team dynamics in the design of clinical trials, especially in the context of emergent use research.
Figures
Similar articles
-
How do general practitioners work together with other health care providers: policy, reality and research perspectives within the Australian context?J Interprof Care. 2003 Aug;17(3):303-4. doi: 10.1080/1356182031000122924. J Interprof Care. 2003. PMID: 12850881 No abstract available.
-
The culture of a trauma team in relation to human factors.J Clin Nurs. 2006 Oct;15(10):1257-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01566.x. J Clin Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16968430
-
Improving medication adherence in chronic disease management.J Fam Pract. 2011 Apr;60(4 Suppl Improving):S1-8. J Fam Pract. 2011. PMID: 21472145 No abstract available.
-
A new tool to give hospitalists feedback to improve interprofessional teamwork and advance patient care.Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2485-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0611. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012. PMID: 23129679 Review.
-
Interdisciplinary researching: exploring the opportunities and risks of working together.Nurs Health Sci. 2006 Jun;8(2):88-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2006.00257.x. Nurs Health Sci. 2006. PMID: 16764560 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical trials.Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Feb 22;31(2):162-164. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003471. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2024. PMID: 36931719 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Hoffman A, Montgomery R, Aubry W, Tunis SR. How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in designing comparative effectiveness studies. Health Aff. 2010;29(10):1834–41. - PubMed
-
- US Department of Health and Human Services, editor. Guidance for Institutional Review Boards, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors Exception from Informed Consent Requirements for Emergency Research, F.a.D.A. Silver Spring, MD: 2011. updated 2013.
-
- Smischney NJ, Onigkeit JA, Hinds RF, Nicholson WT. Re-evaluating ethical concerns in planned emergency research involving critically ill patients: an interpretation of the guidance document from the United States food and drug administration. J Clin Ethics. 2015;26(1):61–67. - PubMed
-
- Gawande A. The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. 1st ed. New York: Metropolitan Books; 2010. p. 209.
-
- Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725–32. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical