Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;16(4):154-9.
doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2012.16.4.154. Epub 2012 Nov 30.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal operations

Affiliations

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal operations

Keong Won Yun et al. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: We aimed to to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery.

Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on data from the attempted laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in 44 patients. Among them, 5 patients with previous lower abdominal operation were excluded. 39 patients were divided into two groups according to presence of previous upper abdominal operation; Group A: patients without history of abdominal operation. (n=27), Group B: patients with history of upper abdominal operation. Both groups (n=12) were compared to each other, with respect to clinical characteristics, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, open conversion rate, postoperative complication, duct clearance and mortality.

Results: All of the 39 patients received laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and choledochotomy with T-tube drainage (n=38 [97.4%]) or with primary closure (n=1). These two groups were not statistically different in gender, mean age and presence of co-morbidity, mean operation time (164.5±63.1 min in group A and 134.8±45.2 min in group B, p=0.18) and postoperative hospital stay (12.6±5.7 days in group A and 9.8±2.9 days in group B, p=0.158). Duct clearance and complication rates were comparable (p>0.05). 4 cases were converted to open in group A and 1 case in group B respectively. In group A (4 of 27 (14.8%) and 1 of 12 (8.3%) in group B, p=0.312) Trocar or Veress needle related complication did not occur in either group.

Conclusions: LCBDE appears to be a safe and effective treatment even in the patients with previous upper abdominal operation if performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeon, and it can be the best alternative to failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for difficult cholelithiasis.

Keywords: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; Previous surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beal JM. Historical perspective of gallstone disease. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984;158:181–189. - PubMed
    1. Soper NJ. Laparoscopic general surgery--past, present, and future. Surgery. 1993;113:1–3. - PubMed
    1. Crawford DL, Phillips EH. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. World J Surg. 1999;23:343–349. - PubMed
    1. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:652–656. - PubMed
    1. Poulose BK, Arbogast PG, Holzman MD. National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:186–190. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources