Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Sep 21;5(9):e008050.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008050.

Effectiveness of peer educators on the uptake of mobile X-ray tuberculosis screening at homeless hostels: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of peer educators on the uptake of mobile X-ray tuberculosis screening at homeless hostels: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Robert W Aldridge et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Trial design: Cluster randomised controlled trial.

Objective: To compare current practice for encouraging homeless people to be screened for tuberculosis on a mobile digital X-ray unit in London, UK, with the additional use of volunteer peer educators who have direct experience of tuberculosis, homelessness or both.

Participants: 46 hostels took part in the study, with a total of 2342 residents eligible for screening. The study took place between February 2012 and October 2013 at homeless hostels in London, UK.

Intervention: At intervention sites, volunteer peer educators agreed to a work plan that involved moving around the hostel in conjunction with the hostel staff, and speaking to residents in order to encourage them to attend the screening.

Randomisation: Cluster randomisation (by hostel) was performed using an internet-based service to ensure allocation concealment, with minimisation by hostel size and historical screening uptake.

Blinding: Only the study statistician was blinded to the allocation of intervention or control arms.

Primary outcome: The primary outcome was the number of eligible clients at a hostel venue screened for active pulmonary tuberculosis by the mobile X-ray unit.

Results: A total of 59 hostels were considered for eligibility and 46 were randomised. Control sites had a total of 1192 residents, with a median uptake of 45% (IQR 33-55). Intervention sites had 1150 eligible residents with a median uptake of 40% (IQR 25-61). Using Poisson regression to account for the clustered study design, hostel size and historical screening levels, there was no evidence that peer educators increased uptake (adjusted risk ratio 0.98; 95% CIs 0.80 to 1.20). The study team noted no adverse events.

Conclusions: This study found no evidence that volunteer peer educators increased client uptake of mobile X-ray unit screening for tuberculosis. Further qualitative work should be undertaken to explore the possible ancillary benefits to peer volunteers.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN17270334.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maps of London by local authority detailing: rates of tuberculosis (A); total eligible clients at all homeless hostels (B); total number of clients screened at hostels as part of the study (C).

References

    1. Agency HP. Tuberculosis in the UK: 2013 report. http://www.hpa.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb_C/1317139689732 (accessed 9 Apr 2014).
    1. De Vries G, Aldridge RW, Cayla JA et al. . Epidemiology of tuberculosis in big cities of the European Union and European Economic Area countries. Euro Surveill 2014;19:pii: 20726. - PubMed
    1. Story A, Murad S, Roberts W et al. . Tuberculosis in London: the importance of homelessness, problem drug use and prison. Thorax 2007;62:667–71. 10.1136/thx.2006.065409 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Vries G, van Hest RA. From contact investigation to tuberculosis screening of drug addicts and homeless persons in Rotterdam. Eur J Public Health 2006;16:133–6. 10.1093/eurpub/cki203 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Craig GM, Booth H, Story A et al. . The impact of social factors on tuberculosis management. J Adv Nurs 2007;58:418–24. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04257.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources