Baseline Depression Severity as Moderator of Depression Outcomes Between Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Pharmacotherapy: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis
- PMID: 26397232
- DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1516
Baseline Depression Severity as Moderator of Depression Outcomes Between Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Pharmacotherapy: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis
Abstract
Importance: Current guidelines recommend treating severe depression with pharmacotherapy. Randomized clinical trials as well as traditional meta-analyses have considerable limitations in testing for moderators of treatment outcomes.
Objectives: To conduct a systematic literature search, collect primary data from trials, and analyze baseline depression severity as a moderator of treatment outcomes between cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and antidepressant medication (ADM).
Data sources: A total of 14 902 abstracts were examined from a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Cochrane Registry of Controlled Trials from 1966 to January 1, 2014.
Study selection: Randomized clinical trials in which CBT and ADM were compared in patients with a DSM-defined depressive disorder were included.
Data extraction and synthesis: Study authors were asked to provide primary data from their trial. Primary data from 16 of 24 identified trials (67%), with 1700 outpatients (794 from the CBT condition and 906 from the ADM condition), were included. Missing data were imputed with multiple imputation methods. Mixed-effects models adjusting for study-level differences were used to examine baseline depression severity as a moderator of treatment outcomes.
Main outcomes and measures: Seventeen-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
Results: There was a main effect of ADM over CBT on the HAM-D (β = -0.88; P = .03) and a nonsignificant trend on the BDI (β = -1.14; P = .08, statistical test for trend), but no significant differences in response (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; P = .12) or remission (OR, 1.18; P = .22). Mixed-effects models using the HAM-D indicated that baseline depression severity does not moderate reductions in depressive symptoms between CBT and ADM at outcome (β = 0.00; P = .96). Similar results were seen using the BDI. Baseline depression severity also did not moderate the likelihood of response (OR, 0.99; P = .77) or remission (OR, 1.00; P = .93) between CBT and ADM.
Conclusions and relevance: Baseline depression severity did not moderate differences between CBT and ADM on the HAM-D or BDI or in response or remission. This finding cannot be extrapolated to other psychotherapies, to individual ADMs, or to inpatients. However, it offers new and substantial evidence that is of relevance to researchers, physicians and therapists, and patients.
Comment in
-
No evidence that CBT is less effective than antidepressants in moderate to severe depression.Evid Based Ment Health. 2016 Nov;19(4):125. doi: 10.1136/eb-2016-102381. Epub 2016 Aug 19. Evid Based Ment Health. 2016. PMID: 27543494 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Divergent Outcomes in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Pharmacotherapy for Adult Depression.Am J Psychiatry. 2016 May 1;173(5):481-90. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15040492. Epub 2016 Feb 12. Am J Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 26869246 Free PMC article.
-
Melancholic and atypical depression as predictor and moderator of outcome in cognitive behavior therapy and pharmacotherapy for adult depression.Depress Anxiety. 2017 Mar;34(3):246-256. doi: 10.1002/da.22580. Epub 2016 Dec 6. Depress Anxiety. 2017. PMID: 27921338
-
Gender as predictor and moderator of outcome in cognitive behavior therapy and pharmacotherapy for adult depression: an "individual patient data" meta-analysis.Depress Anxiety. 2014 Nov;31(11):941-51. doi: 10.1002/da.22328. Depress Anxiety. 2014. PMID: 25407584
-
Baseline Severity as a Moderator of the Waiting List-Controlled Association of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With Symptom Change in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 1;80(8):822-831. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.1291. JAMA Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37256597 Free PMC article.
-
Towards personalising treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of face-to-face efficacy moderators of cognitive-behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for major depressive disorder.Psychol Med. 2019 Dec;49(16):2657-2668. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002812. Epub 2019 Oct 16. Psychol Med. 2019. PMID: 31615583
Cited by
-
Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 2. Psychological Treatments.Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;61(9):524-39. doi: 10.1177/0706743716659418. Epub 2016 Aug 2. Can J Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 27486150 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Moderation, mediation, and moderated mediation.World Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;18(3):288-289. doi: 10.1002/wps.20665. World Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31496106 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Unpacking Major Depressive Disorder: From Classification to Treatment Selection.Can J Psychiatry. 2018 May;63(5):308-313. doi: 10.1177/0706743717748883. Epub 2017 Dec 26. Can J Psychiatry. 2018. PMID: 29278937 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The clinical characterization of the adult patient with depression aimed at personalization of management.World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):269-293. doi: 10.1002/wps.20771. World Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 32931110 Free PMC article.
-
Program of algorithm for pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder in China: Benefits or not?Heliyon. 2023 Oct 17;9(11):e20951. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20951. eCollection 2023 Nov. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 37920522 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical