Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;4(1):35-50.

MEMORY FOR POETRY: MORE THAN MEANING?

Rachel M Atchley  1 , Mary L Hare  1
Affiliations

MEMORY FOR POETRY: MORE THAN MEANING?

Rachel M Atchley et al. Int J Cogn Linguist. 2013.

Abstract

The assumption has become that memory for words' sound patterns, or form, is rapidly lost in comparison to content. Memory for form is also assumed to be verbatim rather than schematic. Oral story-telling traditions suggest otherwise. The present experiment investigated if form can be remembered schematically in spoken poetry, a context in which form is important. We also explored if sleep could help preserve memory for form. We tested whether alliterative sound patterns could cue memory for poetry lines both immediately and after a delay of 12 hours that did or did not include sleep. Twelve alliterative poetry lines were modified into same alliteration, different alliteration, and no alliteration paraphrases. We predicted that memory for original poetry lines would be less accurate after 12 hours, same alliteration paraphrases would be falsely recognized as originals more often after 12 hours, and that the no-sleep group would make more errors. Different alliteration and no alliteration paraphrases were not expected to share this effect due to schematically different sound patterns. Our data support these hypotheses and provide evidence that memory for form is schematic in nature, retained in contexts in which form matters, and that sleep may help preserve memory for sound patterns.

Keywords: Memory; form; oral traditions; poetry; sound patterns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Original Phrase Hit Rates Note. * Indicates significance at a p = .05 level or less.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Same Alliteration False Alarm Rates Note. * Indicates significance at a p = .05 level or less.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Different Alliteration False Alarm Rates
Figure 4
Figure 4
No Alliteration False Alarm Rates
Figure 5
Figure 5
Original Phrase Hit Rates by Group Note. * Indicates significance at a p = .05 level or less.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Same Alliteration False Alarm Rates by Group Note. * Indicates significance at a p = .05 level or less.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Different Alliteration False Alarm Rates by Group
Figure 8
Figure 8
No Alliteration False Alarm Rates by Group
Figure 9
Figure 9
Hit and False Alarm Rates Overall Note. * Indicates significance at a p = .05 level or less.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Hit and False Alarm Rates by Group Note. * Indicates significance at a p = .05 level or less.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Acheson DJ, Wells JB, MacDonald MC. New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods. 2008;40:278–289. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson JR, Pichert J. Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1978;17:1–12.
    1. Bransford JD, Franks JJ. The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology. 1971;2:331–350.
    1. Brewer WF, Hay AE. Reconstructive recall of linguistic style. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1984;23:237–249.
    1. Brewer WF, Treyens JC. Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology. 1981;13:207–230.

LinkOut - more resources