Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;46(4):1091-101.
doi: 10.3233/JAD-142988.

Development of Immunoassays for the Quantitative Assessment of Amyloid-β in the Presence of Therapeutic Antibody: Application to Pre-Clinical Studies

Affiliations

Development of Immunoassays for the Quantitative Assessment of Amyloid-β in the Presence of Therapeutic Antibody: Application to Pre-Clinical Studies

Anna Bogstedt et al. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015.

Abstract

Utilizing decision making biomarkers in drug development requires thorough assay validation. Special considerations need to be taken into account when monitoring biomarkers using immunoassays in the presence of therapeutic antibodies. We have developed robust and sensitive assays to assess target engagement and proof of mechanism to support the clinical progression of a human monoclonal antibody against the neurotoxic amyloid-β (Aβ)42 peptide. Here we present the introduction of novel pre-treatment steps to ensure drug-tolerant immunoassays and describe the validation of the complete experimental procedures to measure total Aβ42 concentration (bound and unbound) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma, free Aβ42 concentration (unbound) in CSF, and Aβ40 concentration in CSF. The difference in composition of the matrices (CSF and plasma) and antigen levels therein, in combination with the hydrophobic properties of Aβ protein, adds to the complexity of validation. Monitoring pharmacodynamics of an Aβ42 specific monoclonal antibody in a non-human primate toxicology study using these assays, we demonstrated a 1500-fold and a 3000-fold increase in total Aβ42 in plasma, a 4-fold and 8-fold increase in total Aβ42 in CSF together with a 95% and 96% reduction of free Aβ42 in CSF following weekly intravenous injections of 10 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg, respectively. Levels of Aβ40 were unchanged. The accuracy of these data is supported by previous pre-clinical studies as well as predictive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics modeling. In contrast, when analyzing the same non-human primate samples excluding the pre-treatment steps, we were not able to distinguish between free and total Aβ42. Our data clearly demonstrate the importance of thorough evaluation of antibody interference and appropriate validation to monitor different types of biomarkers in the presence of a therapeutic antibody.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; amyloid-β; biomarkers; cerebrospinal fluid; immunotherapy; plasma; pre-clinical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1
A schematic illustration of the assay set up to measure free Aβ42 in CSF (A), total Aβ42 in CSF (B), and total Aβ42 in plasma (C).
Fig.2
Fig.2
illustrates the increase of total Aβ42 in plasma (A) over time and total Aβ42 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (B), the reduction of free Aβ42 in CSF (C) as well as Aβ40 in CSF (D) at termination, after treatment with 10 mg (grey circle) or 100 mg (closed circle or squares for wash out samples) therapeutic antibody or placebo (open circle or squares for wash out samples). Assessment of Aβ levels were performed using the in house developed and validated assays. wo, wash out samples after last dose (d94).
Fig.3
Fig.3
illustrates the levels of Aβ42 in plasma (A) over time or cerebrospinal CSF (B) at termination after treatment with 10 mg (grey circle) or 100 mg (closed circle or squares for wash out samples) therapeutic antibody or placebo (open circle or squares for wash out samples). Assessment of Aβ levels were performed using commercially available assays without prior pretreatment steps. wo, wash out samples after last dose (d94).

References

    1. Hardy J, Selkoe DJ. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: Progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 2002;297:353–356. - PubMed
    1. Jonsson T, Atwal JK, Steinberg S, Snaedal J, Jonsson PV, Bjornsson S, Stefansson H, Sulem P, Gudbjartsson D, Maloney J, Hoyte K, Gustafson A, Liu Y, Lu Y, Bhangale T, Graham RR, Huttenlocher J, Bjornsdottir G, Andreassen OA, Jonsson EG, Palotie A, Behrens TW, Magnusson OT, Kong A, Thorsteinsdottir U, Watts RJ, Stefansson K. A mutation in APP protects against Alzheimer’s disease and age-related cognitive decline. Nature. 2012;488:96–99. - PubMed
    1. Ghosh AK, Brindisi M, Tang J. Developing beta-secretase inhibitors for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem. 2012;120(Suppl 1):71–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pettersson M, Stepan AF, Kauffman GW, Johnson DS. Novel gamma-secretase modulators for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A review focusing on patents from 2010 to 2012. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2013;23:1349–1366. - PubMed
    1. Mawuenyega KG, Sigurdson W, Ovod V, Munsell L, Kasten T, Morris JC, Yarasheski KE, Bateman RJ. Decreased clearance of CNS beta-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 2010;330:1774. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms