Report from AmSECT's International Consortium for Evidence- Based Perfusion Consensus Statement: Minimal Criteria for Reporting Cardiopulmonary Bypass-Related Contributions to Red Blood Cell Transfusions Associated With Adult Cardiac Surgery
- PMID: 26405355
- PMCID: PMC4557554
Report from AmSECT's International Consortium for Evidence- Based Perfusion Consensus Statement: Minimal Criteria for Reporting Cardiopulmonary Bypass-Related Contributions to Red Blood Cell Transfusions Associated With Adult Cardiac Surgery
Erratum in
-
Erratum.J Extra Corpor Technol. 2015 Dec;47(4):251. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2015. PMID: 26834291 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Gaps remain in our understanding of the contribution of bypass-related practices associated with red blood cell (RBC) transfusions after cardiac surgery. Variability exists in the reporting of bypass-related practices in the peer-reviewed literature. In an effort to create uniformity in reporting, a draft statement outlining proposed minimal criteria for reporting cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)- related contributions (i.e., RBC data collection/documentation, clinical considerations for transfusions, equipment details, and clinical endpoints) was presented in conjunction with the American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology's (AmSECT's) 2014 Quality and Outcomes Meeting (Baltimore, MD). Based on presentations and feedback from the conference, coauthors (n = 14) developed and subsequently voted on each proposed data element. Data elements receiving a total of 4 votes were dropped from further consideration, 5-9 votes were considered as "Recommended," and elements receiving ≥10 votes were considered as "Mandatory." A total of 52 elements were classified as mandatory, 16 recommended, and 14 dropped. There are 8 mandatory data elements for RBC data collection/documentation, 24 for clinical considerations for transfusions, 13 for equipment details, and 7 for clinical endpoints. We present 52 mandatory data elements reflecting CPB-related contributions to RBC transfusions. Consistency of such reporting would offer our community an increased opportunity to shed light on the relationship between intra-operative practices and RBC transfusions.
Conflict of interest statement
The senior author has stated that the authors have reported no material, financial, or other relationship with any healthcare-related business or other entity whose products or services are discussed in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Landis CR, Murkin JM, Stump DA, et al. . Consensus statement: Minimal criteria for reporting the systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Heart Surg Forum. 2010;13:E116–123. - PubMed
-
- Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline Task Force, Ferraris VA, Ferraris SP, et al. . Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(Suppl 5):S27–86. - PubMed
-
- Snyder-Ramos SA, Mohnle P, Weng YS, et al. . The ongoing variability in blood transfusion practices in cardiac surgery. Transfusion. 2008;48:1284–1299. - PubMed
-
- Shander A, Puzio T, Javidroozi M.. Variability in transfusion practice and effectiveness of strategies to improve it. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:541–544. - PubMed
-
- Bennett-Guerrero E, Zhao Y, O’Brien SM, et al. . Variation in use of blood transfusion in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2010;304:1568–1575. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources