Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1814-23.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510016. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Toni K Choueiri  1 , Bernard Escudier, Thomas Powles, Paul N Mainwaring, Brian I Rini, Frede Donskov, Hans Hammers, Thomas E Hutson, Jae-Lyun Lee, Katriina Peltola, Bruce J Roth, Georg A Bjarnason, Lajos Géczi, Bhumsuk Keam, Pablo Maroto, Daniel Y C Heng, Manuela Schmidinger, Philip W Kantoff, Anne Borgman-Hagey, Colin Hessel, Christian Scheffold, Gisela M Schwab, Nizar M Tannir, Robert J Motzer; METEOR Investigators
Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Toni K Choueiri et al. N Engl J Med. .

Abstract

Background: Cabozantinib is an oral, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) as well as MET and AXL, each of which has been implicated in the pathobiology of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma or in the development of resistance to antiangiogenic drugs. This randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy of cabozantinib, as compared with everolimus, in patients with renal-cell carcinoma that had progressed after VEGFR-targeted therapy.

Methods: We randomly assigned 658 patients to receive cabozantinib at a dose of 60 mg daily or everolimus at a dose of 10 mg daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary efficacy end points were overall survival and objective response rate.

Results: Median progression-free survival was 7.4 months with cabozantinib and 3.8 months with everolimus. The rate of progression or death was 42% lower with cabozantinib than with everolimus (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.75; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 21% with cabozantinib and 5% with everolimus (P<0.001). A planned interim analysis showed that overall survival was longer with cabozantinib than with everolimus (hazard ratio for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.89; P=0.005) but did not cross the significance boundary for the interim analysis. Adverse events were managed with dose reductions; doses were reduced in 60% of the patients who received cabozantinib and in 25% of those who received everolimus. Discontinuation of study treatment owing to adverse events occurred in 9% of the patients who received cabozantinib and in 10% of those who received everolimus.

Conclusions: Progression-free survival was longer with cabozantinib than with everolimus among patients with renal-cell carcinoma that had progressed after VEGFR-targeted therapy. (Funded by Exelixis; METEOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01865747.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
METEOR Study Design
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (Independent Radiology Review Committee)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN. Kidney Cancer estimated incidence and mortality, all ages, both sexes. 2012 http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx. Accessed April 2015.
    1. Gupta K, Miller JD, Li JZ, Russell MW, Charbonneau C. Epidemiologic and socioeconomic burden of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): a literature review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2008;34:193–205. - PubMed
    1. Janzen NK, Kim HL, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Surveillance after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma and management of recurrent disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2003;30:843–52. - PubMed
    1. Kroeger N, Choueiri TK, Lee JL, et al. Survival outcome and treatment response of patients with late relapse from renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy. Eur Urol. 2014;65:1086–92. - PubMed
    1. Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al. Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials. Cancer. 2003;97:1663–71. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data