Update on permanent contraception options for women
- PMID: 26406934
- PMCID: PMC4678034
- DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000213
Update on permanent contraception options for women
Abstract
Purpose of review: Permanent methods are the most commonly used contraceptive options worldwide. Even with the increase in popularity and accessibility of long-acting reversible methods, there remains high demand for permanent options, especially among women in developing countries.
Recent findings: Traditional methods of permanent contraception, such as postpartum tubal ligation and interval surgical tubal occlusion or electrocautery by mini-laparotomy or laparoscopy are well tolerated and highly effective. Bilateral total salpingectomy for ovarian cancer risk reduction is currently being investigated. Hysteroscopic tubal occlusion reduces or eliminates the need for anesthesia, but requires surgical training and specialized equipment. Alternative permanent contraception methods are being explored including immediately effective hysteroscopic methods, and nonsurgical permanent contraception methods that have the potential to improve access and reduce cost.
Summary: Permanent contraception methods are an important part of the contraceptive methods mix designed to meet the needs of women who have completed desired family size or wish never to become pregnant. Current surgical approaches to permanent contraception are well tolerated and highly effective. The development of a highly effective nonsurgical approach could simplify the provision of permanent contraception.
References
-
- Peterson HB. Sterilization: Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):189–203. - PubMed
-
- World Contraceptive Use 2012 [Internet] Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Population Division; [cited 2015 Jun 23]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/family/con....
-
- Chan LM, Westhoff CL. Tubal sterilization trends in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):1–6. - PubMed
-
- Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2009 Jan 28;(11):1–25. - PubMed
-
- DeFrances CJ, Lucas CA, Buie VC, Golosinskiy A. 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2008 Jul 30;(5):1–20. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
