Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;71(12):1415-27.
doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1954-4. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in community-dwelling older people across Europe: a systematic literature review

Affiliations

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in community-dwelling older people across Europe: a systematic literature review

Eline Tommelein et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is one of the main risk factors for adverse drug events (ADEs) in older people.

Purpose: This systematic literature review aims to determine prevalence and type of PIP in community-dwelling older people across Europe, as well as identifying risk factors for PIP.

Methods: The PubMed and Web of Science database were searched systematically for relevant manuscripts (January 1, 2000-December 31, 2014). Manuscripts were included if the study design was observational, the study participants were community-dwelling older patients in Europe, and if a published screening method for PIP was used. Studies that focused on specific pathologies or that focused on merely one inappropriate prescribing issue were excluded. Data analysis was performed using R statistics.

Results: Fifty-two manuscripts were included, describing 82 different sample screenings with an estimated overall PIP prevalence of 22.6 % (CI 19.2-26.7 %; range 0.0-98.0 %). Ten of the sample screenings were based on the Beers 1997 criteria, 19 on the Beers 2003 criteria, 14 on STOPP criteria (2008 version), 8 on START-criteria (2008 version), and 7 on the PRISCUS list. The 24 remaining sample screenings were carried out using compilations of screening methods or used country-specific lists such as the Laroche criteria. It appears that only PIP prevalence calculated from insurance data significantly differs from the other data collection method categories. Furthermore, risk factors most often positively associated with PIP prevalence were polypharmacy, poor functional status, and depression. Drug groups most often involved in PIP were anxiolytics (ATC-code: N05B), antidepressants (N06A), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and anti-rheumatic products (M01A).

Conclusion: PIP prevalence in European community-dwelling older adults is high and depends partially on the data collection method used. Polypharmacy, poor functional status, and depression were identified as the most common risk factors for PIP.

Keywords: Aged; Community-dwelling; Inappropriate prescribing; Primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 24;9(4):e95536 - PubMed
    1. Drugs Aging. 2005;22(1):69-82 - PubMed
    1. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Jul;62(7):1217-23 - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43617 - PubMed
    1. Drugs Aging. 2008;25(8):693-706 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources