Two-group time-to-event continual reassessment method using likelihood estimation
- PMID: 26409251
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.016
Two-group time-to-event continual reassessment method using likelihood estimation
Abstract
The presence of patient heterogeneity in dose finding studies is inherent (i.e. groups with different maximum tolerated doses). When this type of heterogeneity is not accounted for in the trial design, subjects may be exposed to toxic or suboptimal doses. Options to handle patient heterogeneity include conducting separate trials or splitting the trial into arms. However, cost and/or lack of resources may limit the feasibility of these options. If information is shared between the groups, then both of these options do not benefit from using the shared information. Extending current dose finding designs to handle patient heterogeneity maximizes the utility of existing methods within a single trial. We propose a modification to the time-to-event continual reassessment method to accommodate two groups using a two-parameter model and maximum likelihood estimation. The operating characteristics of the design are investigated through simulations under different scenarios including the scenario where one conducts two separate trials, one for each group, using the one-sample time-to-event continual reassessment method.
Keywords: Continual reassessment method; Dose finding; Maximum likelihood; Patient heterogeneity; Phase I trial; Time-to-event.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Shift models for dose-finding in partially ordered groups.Clin Trials. 2019 Feb;16(1):32-40. doi: 10.1177/1740774518801599. Epub 2018 Oct 11. Clin Trials. 2019. PMID: 30309262 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of a two-group likelihood time-to-event continual reassessment method using SAS.Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015 Oct;121(3):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 16. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015. PMID: 26122068
-
Bridging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials in different ethnic populations.Stat Med. 2015 May 10;34(10):1681-94. doi: 10.1002/sim.6442. Epub 2015 Jan 28. Stat Med. 2015. PMID: 25626429
-
Sequential allocation trial design in anesthesia: an introduction to methods, modeling, and clinical applications.Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Mar;27(3):240-247. doi: 10.1111/pan.13088. Epub 2017 Feb 17. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017. PMID: 28211193 Review.
-
Embracing model-based designs for dose-finding trials.Br J Cancer. 2017 Jul 25;117(3):332-339. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.186. Epub 2017 Jun 29. Br J Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28664918 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Rapid enrollment design for finding the optimal dose in immunotherapy trials with ordered groups.J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(4):625-634. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1633654. Epub 2019 Jun 28. J Biopharm Stat. 2019. PMID: 31251112 Free PMC article.
-
A Road Map for Designing Phase I Clinical Trials of Radiotherapy-Novel Agent Combinations.Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Sep 2;28(17):3639-3651. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-4087. Clin Cancer Res. 2022. PMID: 35552622 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Subgroup-specific dose finding in phase I clinical trials based on time to toxicity allowing adaptive subgroup combination.Pharm Stat. 2018 Nov;17(6):734-749. doi: 10.1002/pst.1891. Epub 2018 Aug 15. Pharm Stat. 2018. PMID: 30112806 Free PMC article.
-
Subgroup-specific dose finding for phase I-II trials using Bayesian clustering.Stat Med. 2022 Jul 20;41(16):3164-3179. doi: 10.1002/sim.9410. Epub 2022 Apr 16. Stat Med. 2022. PMID: 35429178 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges, opportunities, and innovative statistical designs for precision oncology trials.Ann Transl Med. 2022 Sep;10(18):1038. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-356. Ann Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 36267789 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources