Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct;25(10):623-632.
doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.002.

Control of Chromatin Structure by Long Noncoding RNA

Affiliations
Review

Control of Chromatin Structure by Long Noncoding RNA

Gudrun Böhmdorfer et al. Trends Cell Biol. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) is a pivotal factor regulating various aspects of genome activity. Genome regulation via DNA methylation and post-translational histone modifications is a well-documented function of lncRNA in plants, fungi, and animals. Here, we summarize evidence showing that lncRNA also controls chromatin structure, including nucleosome positioning and chromosome looping. We focus on data from plant experimental systems, discussed in the context of other eukaryotes. We explain the mechanisms of lncRNA-controlled chromatin remodeling and the implications of the functional interplay between noncoding transcription and several different chromatin remodelers. We propose that the unique properties of RNA make it suitable for controlling chromatin modifications and structure.

Keywords: RNA Polymerase V; chromatin remodeling; chromosome looping; nucleosome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mechanisms preventing negative feedback between non-coding transcription and lncRNA-mediated nucleosome positioning. Pol V produces lncRNA, which serves as a binding scaffold for RNA-binding proteins including IDN2 (top). IDN2 recruits the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, which positions nucleosomes. Positioned nucleosomes contribute to repression of Pol II transcription. In a subsequent round of transcription (bottom) the previously positioned nucleosome could prevent Pol V from transcribing and reinforcing silencing. The RDD complex, which includes the putative chromatin remodeler DRD1, is proposed to remove the nucleosome and facilitate Pol V transcription, thereby preventing negative feedback between lncRNA and lncRNA-mediated nucleosome positioning.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Feedback between non-coding transcription and chromatin in TGS. lncRNA mediates repressive chromatin modifications (DNA methylation and H3K9me2), which facilitate non-coding transcription. Therefore, lncRNA-mediated repressive chromatin modifications are maintained by a positive feedback loop. lncRNA-mediated nucleosome positioning creates a physical obstacle to subsequent rounds of transcription. This way, there is negative feedback between non-coding transcription and nucleosome positioning, which could prevent efficient silencing. Additional chromatin remodelers are presumed to prevent this negative feedback and facilitate efficient silencing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proposed unique features that make lncRNA a versatile factor in controlling chromatin structure. (a) lncRNA may work in cis by staying attached to the transcribing RNA polymerase. Nascent lncRNA provides a binding site for RNA binding proteins. RNA-binding proteins interact with lncRNA by a sequence- or structure-specific mechanism. (b) lncRNA may work in trans by combining nucleotide sequence and complex three-dimensional structure. Sequence complementarity may facilitate lncRNA binding to specific loci in the genome. A complex three-dimensional structure may allow interaction with proteins that are recruited to chromatin or mediate chromosome looping.

References

    1. Wilson RC, Doudna JA. Molecular mechanisms of RNA interference. Annu Rev Biophys. 2013;42:217–239. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rinn JL, Chang HY. Genome regulation by long noncoding RNAs. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:145–166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ENCODE Project Consortium et al. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature. 2007;447:799–816. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doolittle WF. Is junk DNA bunk? A critique of ENCODE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:5294–5300. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graur D, et al. On the immortality of television sets: “function” in the human genome according to the evolution-free gospel of ENCODE. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5:578–590. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources