A systematic review of the nutritional consequences of esophagectomy
- PMID: 26411750
- PMCID: PMC5410167
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.08.010
A systematic review of the nutritional consequences of esophagectomy
Abstract
Background & aims: As improved outcomes after esophagectomy have been observed over the last two decades, the focus on care has shifted to survivorship and quality of life. The aim of this review was to determine changes in nutrition after esophagectomy and to assess the evidence for extended nutrition support.
Methods: A search strategy was developed to identify primary research reporting change in nutritional status a minimum of one month after esophagectomy.
Results: Changes in nutritional parameters reported by 18 studies indicated a weight loss of 5-12% at six months postoperatively. More than half of patients lost >10% of body weight at 12 months. One study reported a persistent weight loss of 14% from baseline three years after surgery. Three studies reporting on longer term follow up noted that 27%-95% of patients failed to regain their baseline weight. Changes in dietary intake (three studies) indicated inadequate energy and protein intake up to three years after surgery. Global quality of life scores reported in one study correlated with better weight preservation. There were a high frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms reported in six studies, most notably in the first year after surgery, but persisting up to 19 years. Extended enteral nutrition on a selective basis has been reported in several studies.
Conclusions: Nutritional status is compromised in the months/years following oesophagectomy and may never return to baseline levels. The causes/consequences of weight loss/impaired nutritional intake require further investigation. The role of extended nutritional support in this population remains unclear.
Keywords: Enteral nutrition; Esophagectomy; Nutrition; Nutritional status; Weight.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
DJ Bowrey and M Baker receive departmental grant support from Nutricia for research unrelated to this submission. DJ Bowrey receives departmental grant funding from Fresenius Kabi for research work unrelated to this submission.
References
-
- Daly JM, Fry WA, Little AG, Winchester DP, McKee RF, Stewart AK, et al. Esophageal cancer: results of an American College of surgeons patient care evaluation study. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190:560–73. - PubMed
-
- National oesophago-gastric cancer audit. Royal College of Surgeons of England; 2012.
-
- Metzger R, Bollschweiler E, Vallbohmer D, Maish M, DeMeester TR, Hölscher AH. High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality. Dis Esophagus. 2004;17:310–4. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
