Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;8(5):590-3.
doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv055. Epub 2015 Jul 5.

End-stage vascular access failure: can we define and can we classify?

Julien Al Shakarchi  1 , Jay Nath  2 , Damian McGrogan  2 , Aurangzaib Khawaja  1 , Melanie Field  2 , Robert G Jones  3 , Nicholas Inston  1
Affiliations

End-stage vascular access failure: can we define and can we classify?

Julien Al Shakarchi et al. Clin Kidney J. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Renal replacement therapy using dialysis has evolved dramatically over recent years with an improvement in patient survival. With this increased longevity, a cohort of patients are in the precarious position of having exhausted the standard routes of vascular access. The extent of this problem of failed access or 'desperate measures' access is difficult to determine, as there are no uniform definitions or classification allowing standardization and few studies have been performed. The aim of this study is to propose a classification of end-stage vascular access (VA) failure and subsequently test its applicability in a dialysis population.

Methods: Using anatomical stratification, a simple hierarchical classification is proposed. This has been applied to a large dialysis population and in particular to patients referred to the complex access clinic dedicated to patients identified as having exhausted standard VA options and also those dialysing on permanent central venous catheters (CVC).

Results: A simple classification is proposed based on a progressive anatomical grading of (I) standard upper arm options exhausted, (II) femoral options exhausted and (III) other options exhausted. These are further subdivided anatomically to allow ease of classification. When applied to a complex group of patients (n = 145) referred to a dedicated complex access clinic, 21 patients were Class I, 26 Class II and 2 Class III. Ninety-six patients did not fall into the classification despite being referred as permanent CVC.

Conclusions: The numbers of patients who have exhausted definitive access options will continue to increase. This simple classification allows the scope of the problem and proposed solutions to be identified. Furthermore, these solutions can be studied and treatments compared in a standardized fashion. The classification may also be applied if patients have the option of transplantation where iliac vessel preservation is desirable and prioritization policies may be instituted.

Keywords: catheter; classification; graft; haemodialysis; vascular access.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pisoni RL, Zepel L, Port FK, et al. Trends in US vascular access use, patient preferences, and related practices: an update from the US DOPPS practice monitor with international comparisons. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 65: 905–915 - PubMed
    1. Dhingra RK, Young EW, Hulbert-Shearon TE, et al. Type of vascular access and mortality in U.S. hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 1443–1451 - PubMed
    1. Allon M, Lok CE. Dialysis fistula or graft: the role for randomized clinical trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 2348–2354 - PubMed
    1. Inston NG, Jones R. Devices in vascular access: is technology overtaking evidence? J Vasc Access 2014; 15: 73–75 - PubMed
    1. Kudlaty EA, Pan J, Allemang MT, et al. The end stage of dialysis access: femoral graft or HeRO vascular access device. Ann Vasc Surg 2015; 29: 90–97 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources