Non operative management of blunt splenic trauma: a prospective evaluation of a standardized treatment protocol
- PMID: 26416401
- DOI: 10.1007/s00068-015-0575-z
Non operative management of blunt splenic trauma: a prospective evaluation of a standardized treatment protocol
Abstract
Purpose: The advantages of the conservative approach for major spleen injuries are still debated. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of NOM in the treatment of minor (grade I-II according with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma; AAST) and severe (AAST grade III-V) blunt splenic trauma, following a standardized treatment protocol.
Methods: All the hemodynamically stable patients with computer tomography (CT) diagnosis of blunt splenic trauma underwent NOM, which included strict clinical and laboratory observation, 48-72 h contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) follow-up and splenic angioembolization, performed both in patients with admission CT evidence of vascular injuries and in patients with falling hematocrit during observation.
Results: 87 patients [32 (36.7 %) women and 55 (63.2 %) men, median age 34 (range 14-68)] were included. Of these, 28 patients (32.1 %) had grade I, 22 patients (25.2 %) grade II, 20 patients (22.9 %) grade III, 11 patients (12.6 %) grade IV and 6 patients (6.8 %) grade V injuries. The overall success rate of NOM was 95.4 % (82/87). There was no significant difference in the success rate between the patients with different splenic injuries grade. Of 24 patients that had undergone angioembolization, 22 (91.6 %) showed high splenic injury grade. The success rate of embolization was 91.6 % (22/24). No major complications were observed. The minor complications (2 pleural effusions, 1 pancreatic fistula and 2 splenic abscesses) were successfully treated by EAUS or CT guided drainage.
Conclusions: The non operative management of blunt splenic trauma, according to our protocol, represents a safe and effective treatment for both minor and severe injuries, achieving an overall success rate of 95 %. The angiographic study could be indicated both in patients with CT evidence of vascular injuries and in patients with high-grade splenic injuries, regardless of CT findings.
Keywords: Angioembolization; Blunt trauma; Non operative management; Splenic injury; Splenic trauma.
Similar articles
-
Prospective trial of angiography and embolization for all grade III to V blunt splenic injuries: nonoperative management success rate is significantly improved.J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Apr;218(4):644-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.040. Epub 2014 Jan 28. J Am Coll Surg. 2014. PMID: 24655852 Clinical Trial.
-
Standardizing quality utilization of interventional radiology treatments of blunt splenic injury: SQUIRTS study.Injury. 2024 Sep;55(9):111707. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111707. Epub 2024 Jun 25. Injury. 2024. PMID: 38942724
-
Proximal splenic angioembolization does not improve outcomes in treating blunt splenic injuries compared with splenectomy: a cohort analysis.J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1346-51; discussion 1351-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818c29ea. J Trauma. 2008. PMID: 19077625
-
Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: what is new?Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Jun;41(3):219-28. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0520-1. Epub 2015 Apr 15. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015. PMID: 26038038 Review.
-
Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults: there is (still) a long way to go. The results of the Bologna-Maggiore Hospital trauma center experience and development of a clinical algorithm.Surg Today. 2015 Oct;45(10):1210-7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1084-0. Epub 2014 Dec 5. Surg Today. 2015. PMID: 25476466 Review.
Cited by
-
A systematic review assessing incorporation of prophylactic splenic artery embolisation (pSAE) into trauma guidelines for the management of high-grade splenic injury.CVIR Endovasc. 2023 Dec 16;6(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s42155-023-00414-6. CVIR Endovasc. 2023. PMID: 38103054 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pre- and post-implementation protocol for non-operative management of grade III-V splenic injuries: An observational study.Heliyon. 2024 Mar 20;10(7):e28447. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28447. eCollection 2024 Apr 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38560121 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence, characteristics and treatment of concomitant injury to liver and spleen with vascular injury after blunt abdominal trauma.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 7;15(1):28972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14113-w. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40775260 Free PMC article.
-
Non-operative management of blunt splenic injury: is it really so extensively feasible? a critical appraisal of a single-center experience.Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Jan 30;32:52. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.52.15022. eCollection 2019. Pan Afr Med J. 2019. PMID: 31143357 Free PMC article.
-
Follow-up strategies for patients with splenic trauma managed non-operatively: the 2022 World Society of Emergency Surgery consensus document.World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct 12;17(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00457-5. World J Emerg Surg. 2022. PMID: 36224617 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources