Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct 19;370(1680):20140368.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0368.

Direct somatic lineage conversion

Affiliations
Review

Direct somatic lineage conversion

Koji Tanabe et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

The predominant view of embryonic development and cell differentiation has been that rigid and even irreversible epigenetic marks are laid down along the path of cell specialization ensuring the proper silencing of unrelated lineage programmes. This model made the prediction that specialized cell types are stable and cannot be redirected into other lineages. Accordingly, early attempts to change the identity of somatic cells had little success and was limited to conversions between closely related cell types. Nuclear transplantation experiments demonstrated, however, that specialized cells even from adult mammals can be reprogrammed into a totipotent state. The discovery that a small combination of transcription factors can reprogramme cells to pluripotency without the need of oocytes further supported the view that these epigenetic barriers can be overcome much easier than assumed, but the extent of this flexibility was still unclear. When we showed that a differentiated mesodermal cell can be directly converted to a differentiated ectodermal cell without a pluripotent intermediate, it was suggested that in principle any cell type could be converted into any other cell type. Indeed, the work of several groups in recent years has provided many more examples of direct somatic lineage conversions. Today, the question is not anymore whether a specific cell type can be generated by direct reprogramming but how it can be induced.

Keywords: cell fate conversion; direct reprogramming; induced neuronal cells; induced pluripotent stem cells; pluripotent stem cell-derived induced neuronal cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schneuwly S, Klemenz R, Gehring WJ. 1987. Redesigning the body plan of Drosophila by ectopic expression of the homoeotic gene Antennapedia. Nature 325, 816–818. ( 10.1038/325816a0) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quiring R, Walldorf U, Kloter U, Gehring WJ. 1994. Homology of the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the Small eye gene in mice and Aniridia in humans. Science 265, 785–789. ( 10.1126/science.7914031) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tapscott SJ, Davis RL, Thayer MJ, Cheng PF, Weintraub H, Lassar AB. 1988. MyoD1: a nuclear phosphoprotein requiring a Myc homology region to convert fibroblasts to myoblasts. Science 242, 405–411. ( 10.1126/science.3175662) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weintraub H, Tapscott SJ, Davis RL, Thayer MJ, Adam MA, Lassar AB, Miller AD. 1989. Activation of muscle-specific genes in pigment, nerve, fat, liver, and fibroblast cell lines by forced expression of MyoD. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 5434–5438. ( 10.1073/pnas.86.14.5434) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi J, Costa ML, Mermelstein CS, Chagas C, Holtzer S, Holtzer H. 1990. MyoD converts primary dermal fibroblasts, chondroblasts, smooth muscle, and retinal pigmented epithelial cells into striated mononucleated myoblasts and multinucleated myotubes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 7988–7992. ( 10.1073/pnas.87.20.7988) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources