Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;10(19):2989-3001.
doi: 10.2217/nnm.15.115. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

RALA-mediated delivery of FKBPL nucleic acid therapeutics

Affiliations

RALA-mediated delivery of FKBPL nucleic acid therapeutics

Rachel Bennett et al. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Aims: RALA is a novel 30 mer bioinspired amphipathic peptide that is showing promise for gene delivery. Here, we used RALA to deliver the FK506-binding protein like - FKBPL gene (pFKBPL) - a novel member of the immunophilin protein family. FKBPL is a secreted protein, with overexpression shown to inhibit angiogenesis, tumor growth and stemness, through a variety of intra- and extracellular signaling mechanisms. We also elucidated proangiogenic activity and stemness after utilizing RALA to deliver siRNA (siFKBPL).

Materials & methods: The RALA/pFKBPL and RALA/siFKBPL nanoparticles were characterized in terms of size, charge, stability and toxicity. Overexpression and knockdown of FKBPL was assessed in vitro and in vivo.

Results: RALA delivered both pFKBPL and siFKBPL with less cytotoxicity than commercially available counterparts. In vivo, RALA/pFKBPL delivery retarded tumor growth, and prolonged survival with an associated decrease in angiogenesis, while RALA/siFKBPL had no effect on tumor growth rate or survival, but resulted in an increase in angiogenesis and stemness.

Conclusion: RALA is an effective delivery system for both FKBPL DNA and RNAi and highlights an alternative therapeutic approach to harnessing FKBPL's antiangiogenic and antistemness activity.

Keywords: FKBPL DNA; RALA peptide; RNAi; antiangiogenic; nanoparticle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial & competing interests disclosure

This project was supported through a BBSRC grant awarded to T Robson (BB/I006958/1) covering salary for A Yakkundi. R Bennett was supported by Department of Employment and Learning PhD studentship. NI–MPL is supported by Cancer Research UK, the Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre Network and the Friends of the Cancer Centre. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Figures

<b>Figure 1.</b>
Figure 1.. Biophysical characterization of RALA-pFKBPL nanoparticles and RALA-siFKBPL nanoparticles.
(A) Gel retardation assay of RALA-pFKBPL nanoparticles from N:P ratio 0–15. (B) Gel retardation assay of RALA-siFKBPL nanoparticles from N:P ratio 0–15; each lane (L–R) represents an increase in N:P ratio from 0 to 15. (C) Particle size and zeta potential of RALA-pFKBPL nanoparticles (bars = size, line = charge). (D) Particle size and zeta potential of RALA-siFKBPL nanoparticles from N:P ratio 6–15 (bars = size, line = charge). (E) Serum stability of RALA -pFKBPL nanoparticles for 4 h at 37°C. (F) Dynamic light scattering of RALA-pFKBPL (red) and RALA-siFKBPL (green) at N:P10 with PDI and (G) transmission electron microscope image of RALA-siFKBPL complexes at N:P 10 with RALA-siFKBPL nanoparticles indicated by arrows. pFKBPL: FK506-binding protein like – FKBPL gene, delivered using RALA.
<b>Figure 2.</b>
Figure 2.. N:P 10 RALA-siFKBPL and RALA-pFKBPL nanoparticles in vitro.
(A) Western blot for FKBPL expression in ZR-75–1 cells following transfection for 72 h with RALA-siFKBPL or RALA-siNT N:P ratio 10 complexes, and also with Oligofectamine as a positive control. (B) Western blot for FKBPL expression in ZR-75–1 cells following transfection for 72 h with RALA-pFKBPL or RALA-pEV N:P ratio 10, and also with Lipofectamine 2000 as a positive control. (C) Densitometric analysis of RALA-siFKBPL knockdown. n = 3 ± SEM. Statistical analysis was by one-way ANOVA, where *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. (D) Relative cell viability of ZR-75–1 cells 72 h post-transfection with RALA-siFKBPL and RALA-pFKBPL N:P ratio 10 complexes determined via WST-1 assay. n = 3 ± SEM. Statistical analysis was by t-test, where *p < 0.05. pEV: Empty vector plasmid; pFKBPL: FK506-binding protein like – FKBPL gene, delivered using RALA; siFKBPL: FKBPL siRNA; siNT: Nontargeting siRNA.
<b>Figure 3.</b>
Figure 3.. RALA is a suitable delivery vehicle for FKBPL overexpressing plasmid and FKBPL siRNA in vitro and in vivo.
(Ai) In vitro FKBPL knockdown was confirmed by western blot, representative images of which are shown. Twice weekly in vivo ZR-75–1 intratumoral administration of RALA-pFKBPL or of RALA-siFKBPL resulted in enhanced (ii) or reduced (iii) immunohistochemistry staining for FKBPL respectively, and for RALA-pFKBPL, revealed areas of necrosis at the experimental end point ([i]; bottom panel). Prior to intratumoral injection, 2 × 106 ZR-75–1 cells were transfected with a sample of the in vivo nanoparticle preparation, and FKBPL knockdown. (B) Administration of RALA-pFKBPL significantly prolonged survival (time to tumor tripling) (i) and reduced overall tumor growth (ii) compared with administration of RALA-pEV. However, administration of RALA-siFKBPL showed no difference in tumor growth rate (iii). pEV: Empty vector plasmid; pFKBPL: FK506-binding protein like – FKBPL gene, delivered using RALA; siFKBPL: FKBPL siRNA; siNT: Nontargeting siRNA.
<b>Figure 4.</b>
Figure 4.. In vivo ZR-75–1 intratumoral administration of RALA-pFKBPL or RALA-siFKBPL.
(A) Representative images of stained tumor sections following delivery of RALA-siFKBPL or RALA-pFKBPL at 4× and 40× are shown, with vessels marked with arrows. (B) Manual quantification of CD34+ blood vessels. Results were taken from a minimum of 27 fields of view and were statistically analyzed by unpaired t-test with Welch's correction, where **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. (C) A subsequent cell count and mammosphere assay of cells extracted from excised tumors at experimental end point showed a significant increase in cell count and MFE after delivery of siFKBPL compared with delivery of siNT, and a significant decrease in cell count after delivery of pFKBPL compared with delivery of pEV; MFE was unable to be determined for pFKBPL due to insufficient cell numbers. pEV: Empty vector plasmid; pFKBPL: FK506-binding protein like – FKBPL gene, delivered using RALA; SD: Standard deviation; SE: Standard error; siFKBPL: FKBPL siRNA; siNT: Nontargeting siRNA. (C) Data taken from [23].

References

    1. Rana TM. Illuminating the silence: understanding the structure and function of small RNAs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007;8:23–36. - PubMed
    1. McCrudden CM, McCarthy HO. Bioinspired delivery systems. In: Martin F, editor. Gene Therapy – Tools and Potential Applications. InTech; 2013. ISBN: 978–953–51–1014–9.
    1. McCarthy HO, Zholobenko AV, Wang Y, et al. Evaluation of a multi-functional nanocarrier for targeted breast cancer iNOS gene therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 2011;405:196–202. - PubMed
    1. Li W, Nicol F, Szoka FC, Jr, et al. GALA: a designed synthetic pH-responsive amphipathic peptide with applications in drug and gene delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2004;56:967–985. - PubMed
    2. • Explains how the amphipathic peptides were designed and function.

    1. Yang J, Liu H, Zhang X. Design, preparation and application of nucleic acid delivery carriers. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014;32(4):804–817. - PubMed