Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep;30(5):315-9.
doi: 10.5001/omj.2015.65.

Applicability of the Existing CVD Risk Assessment Tools to Type II Diabetics in Oman: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Applicability of the Existing CVD Risk Assessment Tools to Type II Diabetics in Oman: A Review

Abdulhakeem Al-Rawahi et al. Oman Med J. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Patients with type II diabetes (T2DM) have an elevated risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), and it is considered to be a leading cause of morbidity and premature mortality in these patients. Many traditional risk factors such as age, male sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, glycemic control, diabetes duration, renal dysfunction, obesity, and smoking have been studied and identified as independent factors for CVD. Quantifying the risk of CVD among diabetics using the common risk factors in order to plan the treatment and preventive measures is important in the management of these patients as recommended by many clinical guidelines. Therefore, several risk assessment tools have been developed in different parts of the world for this purpose. These include the tools that have been developed for general populations and considered T2DM as a risk factor, and the tools that have been developed for T2DM populations specifically. However, due to the differences in sociodemographic factors and lifestyle patterns, as well as the differences in the distribution of various CVD risk factors in different diabetic populations, the external applicability of these tools on different populations is questionable. This review aims to address the applicability of the existing CVD risk models to the Omani diabetic population.

Keywords: Arabs; Cardiovascular Diseases; Oman; Risk Assessments; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sharma MD, Farmer JA, Garber A. Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors. Curr Med Res Opin 2011. Nov;27(S3)(Suppl 3):1-5. 10.1185/03007995.2011.620083 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Dieren S, Beulens JW, van der Schouw YT, Grobbee DE, Neal B. The global burden of diabetes and its complications: an emerging pandemic. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010. May;17(1)(Suppl 1):S3-S8. 10.1097/01.hjr.0000368191.86614.5a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martín-Timón I, Sevillano-Collantes C, Segura-Galindo A, Del Cañizo-Gómez FJ. Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Have all risk factors the same strength? World J Diabetes 2014. Aug;5(4):444-470. 10.4239/wjd.v5.i4.444 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith-Palmer J, Bae JP, Boye KS, Perez-Nieves M, Valentine WJ. PCV30 - Traditional And Non-Traditional Risk Factors For Cardiovascular Disease In Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review Of Longitudinal Studies. Value Health 2014. Nov;17(7):A478 .10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1374 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGill HC, Jr, McMahan CA, Gidding SS. Preventing heart disease in the 21st century: implications of the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) study. Circulation 2008. Mar;117(9):1216-1227. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.717033 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources