A comparison of non-invasive imaging modalities: Infrared thermography, spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis and laser Doppler imaging for the assessment of adult burns
- PMID: 26421694
- DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.06.023
A comparison of non-invasive imaging modalities: Infrared thermography, spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis and laser Doppler imaging for the assessment of adult burns
Abstract
Background: Currently, the only evidence-based adjunct to clinical evaluation of burn depth is laser Doppler imaging (LDI), although preliminary studies of alternative imaging modalities with instant image acquisition are promising. This is a study to investigate the accuracy of infrared thermography (IRT) and spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis (SIA) for burn depth assessment, and compare this to the current gold standard: LDI. We include a comparison of the three modalities in terms of cost, reliability and usability.
Methods: We recruited 20 patients with burns presenting to the Chelsea and Westminster Adult Burns Service. Between 48h and 5 days afterburn we recorded imaging using moorLDI2-BI-VR (LDI), FLIR E60 (IRT) and Scanoskin™ (SIA). Subsequent clinical management and outcome was as normal, and not affected by the extra images taken.
Results: 24 burn regions were grouped according to burn wound healing: group A healed within 14 days, group B within 14-21 days, and group C took more than 21 days or underwent grafting. Both LDI and IRT accurately determined healing potential in groups A and C, but failed to distinguish between groups B and C (p>0.05). Scanoskin™ interpretation of SIA was 100% consistent with clinical outcome.
Conclusion: FLIR E60 and Scanoskin™ both present advantages to moorLDI2-BI-VR in terms of cost, ease-of-use and acceptability to patients. IRT is unlikely to challenge LDI as the gold standard as it is subject to the systematic bias of evaporative cooling. At present, the LDI colour-coded palette is the easiest method for image interpretation, whereas Scanoskin™ monochrome colour-palettes are more difficult to interpret. However the additional analyses of pigment available using SIA may help more accurately indicate the depth of burn compared with perfusion alone. We suggest development of Scanoskin™ software to include a simplified colour-palette similar to LDI and additional work to further investigate the potential of SIA as an alternative to the current gold standard.
Keywords: Infrared thermography; LDI; Spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A comparative evaluation of spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis and laser doppler imaging in the assessment of adult and paediatric burn injuries.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Jul;71(7):1015-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 29. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018. PMID: 29776847
-
Burn wound healing time assessed by laser Doppler imaging (LDI). Part 1: Derivation of a dedicated colour code for image interpretation.Burns. 2012 Mar;38(2):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.11.009. Epub 2011 Nov 23. Burns. 2012. PMID: 22115981
-
A prospective study comparing the FLIR ONE with laser Doppler imaging in the assessment of burn depth by a tertiary burns unit in the United Kingdom.Scars Burn Heal. 2020 Dec 23;6:2059513120974261. doi: 10.1177/2059513120974261. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Scars Burn Heal. 2020. PMID: 33489315 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review on the quality of measurement techniques for the assessment of burn wound depth or healing potential.Burns. 2019 Mar;45(2):261-281. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jun 23. Burns. 2019. PMID: 29941159
-
Evidence Based Burn Depth Assessment Using Laser-Based Technologies: Where Do We Stand?J Burn Care Res. 2021 May 7;42(3):513-525. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa195. J Burn Care Res. 2021. PMID: 33128377
Cited by
-
In vivo volumetric monitoring of revascularization of traumatized skin using extended depth-of-field photoacoustic microscopy.Front Optoelectron. 2020 Dec;13(4):307-317. doi: 10.1007/s12200-020-1040-0. Epub 2020 Jul 10. Front Optoelectron. 2020. PMID: 36641563 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of topical agents and dressing on pH and temperature on wound healing: A systematic, narrative review.Int Wound J. 2022 Oct;19(6):1397-1408. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13733. Epub 2021 Dec 20. Int Wound J. 2022. PMID: 34931445 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostics for Wound Infections.Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021 Jun;10(6):317-327. doi: 10.1089/wound.2019.1103. Epub 2020 Jul 7. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021. PMID: 32496977 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quantitative long-term measurements of burns in a rat model using Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI) and Laser Speckle Imaging (LSI).Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Mar;49(3):293-304. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22647. Epub 2017 Feb 21. Lasers Surg Med. 2017. PMID: 28220508 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements.Burns Trauma. 2016 Apr 27;4:14. doi: 10.1186/s41038-016-0036-x. eCollection 2016. Burns Trauma. 2016. PMID: 27574684 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical