Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Nov;72(11):1110-8.
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1559.

Effect of a Cognitive-Behavioral Prevention Program on Depression 6 Years After Implementation Among At-Risk Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of a Cognitive-Behavioral Prevention Program on Depression 6 Years After Implementation Among At-Risk Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial

David A Brent et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Importance: Adolescents whose parents have a history of depression are at risk for developing depression and functional impairment. The long-term effects of prevention programs on adolescent depression and functioning are not known.

Objective: To determine whether a cognitive-behavioral prevention (CBP) program reduced the incidence of depressive episodes, increased depression-free days, and improved developmental competence 6 years after implementation.

Design, setting, and participants: A 4-site randomized clinical trial compared the effect of CBP plus usual care vs usual care, through follow-up 75 months after the intervention (88% retention), with recruitment from August 2003 through February 2006 at a health maintenance organization, university medical centers, and a community mental health center. A total of 316 participants were 13 to 17 years of age at enrollment and had at least 1 parent with current or prior depressive episodes. Participants could not be in a current depressive episode but had to have subsyndromal depressive symptoms or a prior depressive episode currently in remission. Analysis was conducted between August 2014 and June 2015.

Interventions: The CBP program consisted of 8 weekly 90-minute group sessions followed by 6 monthly continuation sessions. Usual care consisted of any family-initiated mental health treatment.

Main outcomes and measures: The Depression Symptoms Rating scale was used to assess the primary outcome, new onsets of depressive episodes, and to calculate depression-free days. A modified Status Questionnaire assessed developmental competence (eg, academic or interpersonal) in young adulthood.

Results: Over the 75-month follow-up, youths assigned to CBP had a lower incidence of depression, adjusting for current parental depression at enrollment, site, and all interactions (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.53-0.96]). The CBP program's overall significant effect was driven by a lower incidence of depressive episodes during the first 9 months after enrollment. The CBP program's benefit was seen in youths whose index parent was not depressed at enrollment, on depression incidence (hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36-0.81]), depression-free days (d = 0.34, P = .01), and developmental competence (d = 0.36, P = .04); these effects on developmental competence were mediated via the CBP program's effect on depression-free days.

Conclusions and relevance: The effect of CBP on new onsets of depression was strongest early and was maintained throughout the follow-up period; developmental competence was positively affected 6 years later. The effectiveness of CBP may be enhanced by additional booster sessions and concomitant treatment of parental depression.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT00073671.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Brent is a member of the editorial board of UpToDate and receives royalties from the Guilford Press and eRT. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Diagram of Flow of Participants From Screening to Analysis CES-D indicates Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression Scale. a Of these 16 adolescents, 13 completed the 75-month (6-year) follow-up. b Of these 23 adolescents, 16 completed the 75-month (6-year) follow-up.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Parental Depression at Baseline Evaluation as Moderator of Primary Outcome (Time to Onset of a Depressive Episode)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Moderation/Moderated-Mediation Analysis of Developmental Competence Solid lines indicate statistically significant paths, and dashed lines represent nonstatistically significant paths.

Comment in

References

    1. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51(1):8–19. - PubMed
    1. The burden of depression. Nature. 2014;515(7526):163. - PubMed
    1. Avenevoli S, Swendsen J, He JP, Burstein M, Merikangas KR. Major depression in the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement: prevalence, correlates, and treatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;54(1):37–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fried EI, Nesse RM. The impact of individual depressive symptoms on impairment of psychosocial functioning. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e90311. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pettit JW, Lewinsohn PM, Roberts RE, Seeley JR, Monteith L. The long-term course of depression: development of an empirical index and identification of early adult outcomes. Psychol Med. 2009;39(3):403–412. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data