Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;22(4):505-15.
doi: 10.1002/lt.24347.

Determinants of outcome among patients with acute liver failure listed for liver transplantation in the United States

Affiliations

Determinants of outcome among patients with acute liver failure listed for liver transplantation in the United States

K Rajender Reddy et al. Liver Transpl. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Analyses of outcomes after acute liver failure (ALF) have typically included all ALF patients regardless of whether they were listed for liver transplantation (LT). We hypothesized that limiting analysis to listed patients might provide novel insights into factors associated with outcome, focusing attention on disease evolution after listing. Listed adult ALF patients enrolled in the US Acute Liver Failure Study Group registry between 2000 and 2013 were analyzed to determine baseline factors associated with 21-day outcomes after listing. We classified 617 patients (36% of overall ALF group) by 3-week outcome after study admission: 117 were spontaneous survivors (SSs; survival without LT), 108 died without LT, and 392 underwent LT. Only 22% of N-acetyl-p-aminophenol (APAP) ALF patients were listed; however, this group of 173 patients demonstrated greater illness severity: higher coma grades and more patients requiring ventilator, vasopressor, or renal replacement therapy support. Only 62/173 (36%) of APAP patients received a graft versus 66% for drug-induced liver injury patients, 86% for autoimmune-related ALF, and 71% for hepatitis B-related ALF. APAP patients were more likely to die than non-APAP patients (24% versus 17%), and the median time to death was sooner (2 versus 4.5 days). Despite greater severity of illness, the listed APAP group still had a SS rate of 40% versus 11% for non-APAP causes (P < 0.001). APAP outcomes evolve rapidly, mainly to SS or death. Patients with APAP ALF listed for LT had the highest death rate of any etiology, whereas more slowly evolving etiologies yielded higher LT rates and, consequently, fewer deaths. Decisions to list and transplant must be made early in all ALF patients, particularly in those with APAP ALF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT: KRR, CE, MS, RTS, RJF, VED, and WML have no conflicts of interest regarding this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart describing construction of analysis dataset and three categories among the listed patients based on outcome at 21 days.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Median time to event for disease progression by etiology. Symbol represents median time to event and surrounding bar represents interquartile range. (Black) Admission – Symptom Onset; (Red) Admission – List; (Green) Admission – Removal/Transplant; (Blue) Admission-Death.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagrammatic representation of events by day after registry enrollment/listing according to etiology groups: a: APAP, b: Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH), c: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and d: Hepatitis B. Most of the deaths and transplants in the APAP group (3a) took place within the first 48 hours, while both deaths and transplants evolved more slowly in the three non-APAP categories (3b–d). The remaining patients resemble the non-APAP groups. Figure is restricted to only those patients with a date of listing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagrammatic representation of events by day after registry enrollment/listing according to etiology groups: a: APAP, b: Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH), c: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and d: Hepatitis B. Most of the deaths and transplants in the APAP group (3a) took place within the first 48 hours, while both deaths and transplants evolved more slowly in the three non-APAP categories (3b–d). The remaining patients resemble the non-APAP groups. Figure is restricted to only those patients with a date of listing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagrammatic representation of events by day after registry enrollment/listing according to etiology groups: a: APAP, b: Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH), c: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and d: Hepatitis B. Most of the deaths and transplants in the APAP group (3a) took place within the first 48 hours, while both deaths and transplants evolved more slowly in the three non-APAP categories (3b–d). The remaining patients resemble the non-APAP groups. Figure is restricted to only those patients with a date of listing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagrammatic representation of events by day after registry enrollment/listing according to etiology groups: a: APAP, b: Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH), c: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and d: Hepatitis B. Most of the deaths and transplants in the APAP group (3a) took place within the first 48 hours, while both deaths and transplants evolved more slowly in the three non-APAP categories (3b–d). The remaining patients resemble the non-APAP groups. Figure is restricted to only those patients with a date of listing.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ostapowicz G, Fontana RJ, Schiødt FV, et al. Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 tertiary care centers in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:947–954. - PubMed
    1. Bernal W, Wendon J. Acute liver failure. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2525–2534. - PubMed
    1. Lee WM. Acute liver failure. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;33:36–45. - PubMed
    1. Lee WM, Squires RH, Nyberg SL, et al. Acute liver failure: summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 2008;47:1401–1415. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cholongitas E, Theocharidou E, Vasianopoulou P, et al. Comparison of the sequential organ failure assessment score with the King's College Hospital criteria and the model for end-stage liver disease score for the prognosis of acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Liver Transplant. 2012;18:405–412. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms