Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?
- PMID: 26423180
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00307-4
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?
Abstract
The biomedical research complex has been estimated to consume almost a quarter of a trillion US dollars every year. Unfortunately, evidence suggests that a high proportion of this sum is avoidably wasted. In 2014, The Lancet published a series of five reviews showing how dividends from the investment in research might be increased from the relevance and priorities of the questions being asked, to how the research is designed, conducted, and reported. 17 recommendations were addressed to five main stakeholders-funders, regulators, journals, academic institutions, and researchers. This Review provides some initial observations on the possible effects of the Series, which seems to have provoked several important discussions and is on the agendas of several key players. Some examples of individual initiatives show ways to reduce waste and increase value in biomedical research. This momentum will probably move strongly across stakeholder groups, if collaborative relationships evolve between key players; further important work is needed to increase research value. A forthcoming meeting in Edinburgh, UK, will provide an initial forum within which to foster the collaboration needed.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: librarians are listening and are part of the answer.Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1601. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30241-0. Epub 2016 Apr 14. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27116055 No abstract available.
-
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research.Lancet. 2016 Aug 6;388(10044):562. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31216-8. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27511781 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Academic response to improving value and reducing waste: A comprehensive framework for INcreasing QUality In patient-oriented academic clinical REsearch (INQUIRE).PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 7;15(6):e1002580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002580. eCollection 2018 Jun. PLoS Med. 2018. PMID: 29879117 Free PMC article.
-
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: librarians are listening and are part of the answer.Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1601. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30241-0. Epub 2016 Apr 14. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27116055 No abstract available.
-
The impact of clinical trial units on the value of clinical research in Switzerland.Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Apr 26;148:w14615. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14615. eCollection 2018. Swiss Med Wkly. 2018. PMID: 29698540 Review.
-
Increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research.Lancet Neurol. 2017 May;16(5):399-408. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30078-9. Lancet Neurol. 2017. PMID: 28414653 Review.
-
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24. Forsch Komplementmed. 2014. PMID: 24851850
Cited by
-
Clarifying questions about "risk factors": predictors versus explanation.Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 8;15:10. doi: 10.1186/s12982-018-0080-z. eCollection 2018. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 30116285 Free PMC article.
-
Do German university medical centres promote robust and transparent research? A cross-sectional study of institutional policies.Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Apr 12;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00841-2. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022. PMID: 35413846 Free PMC article.
-
Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis.Trials. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3944-9. Trials. 2020. PMID: 31910857 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of an Audit and Feedback Intervention to Facilitate Journal Policy Change Towards Greater Promotion of Transparency and Openness in Sports Science Research.Sports Med Open. 2022 Aug 6;8(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00496-x. Sports Med Open. 2022. PMID: 35932429 Free PMC article.
-
Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlands.BMJ Open. 2019 May 15;9(5):e027903. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027903. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31097488 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources