Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;28(11):1535-42.
doi: 10.1002/nbm.3420. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

Modeling of T2* decay in vertebral bone marrow fat quantification

Affiliations

Modeling of T2* decay in vertebral bone marrow fat quantification

Dimitrios C Karampinos et al. NMR Biomed. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Bone marrow fat fraction mapping using chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation is becoming a useful tool in investigating the association between bone marrow adiposity and bone health and in assessing cancer treatment-induced bone marrow damage. Vertebral bone marrow is characterized by short T2* relaxation times, which are in general different for the water and fat components and can confound fat quantification. The purpose of the present study is to compare different approaches to T2* correction in chemical shift encoding-based water-fat imaging of vertebral bone marrow using single-voxel MRS as reference. Eight-echo gradient-echo imaging and single-voxel MRS measurements were made on the spine (L3-L5) of 25 healthy volunteers. Different approaches were evaluated for correction of T2* effects: (a) single-T2* correction, (b) dual-T2* correction, (c) T2' correction using the a priori-known T2 from the MRS at each vertebral body and (d) T2' correction using the a priori-known T2 equal to previously measured average values. Dual-T2* correction resulted in noisier imaging fat fraction maps than single-T2* correction or T2' correction using a priori-known T2. Linear regression analysis between imaging and MRS fat fraction showed a slope significantly different from 1 when using single-T2* correction (R(2) = 0.96) or dual-T2* correction (R(2) = 0.87). T2' correction using the a priori-known T2 resulted in a slope not significantly different from 1, an intercept significantly different from 0 (between 2.4% and 3%) and R(2) = 0.96. Therefore, a T2' correction using a priori-known T2 can remove the fat fraction bias induced by the difference in T2* between water and fat components without degrading noise performance in fat fraction mapping of vertebral bone marrow.

Keywords: MRI; MRS; fat quantification; spine; vertebral bone marrow; water-fat separation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources