Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Sep 30:6:19.
doi: 10.1186/s13167-015-0041-3. eCollection 2015.

Assessing value of innovative molecular diagnostic tests in the concept of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine

Affiliations
Review

Assessing value of innovative molecular diagnostic tests in the concept of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine

Ildar Akhmetov et al. EPMA J. .

Abstract

Molecular diagnostic tests drive the scientific and technological uplift in the field of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine offering invaluable clinical and socioeconomic benefits to the key stakeholders. Although the results of diagnostic tests are immensely influential, molecular diagnostic tests (MDx) are still grudgingly reimbursed by payers and amount for less than 5 % of the overall healthcare costs. This paper aims at defining the value of molecular diagnostic test and outlining the most important components of "value" from miscellaneous assessment frameworks, which go beyond accuracy and feasibility and impact the clinical adoption, informing healthcare resource allocation decisions. The authors suggest that the industry should facilitate discussions with various stakeholders throughout the entire assessment process in order to arrive at a consensus about the depth of evidence required for positive marketing authorization or reimbursement decisions. In light of the evolving "value-based healthcare" delivery practices, it is also recommended to account for social and ethical parameters of value, since these are anticipated to become as critical for reimbursement decisions and test acceptance as economic and clinical criteria.

Keywords: Companion diagnostics; Cost-effectiveness; Economic models; Health technology assessment; Market access; Predictive Preventive Personalized Medicine; Reimbursement; Strategy; Value.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Graphic representation of the ACCE system for assessing genomic tests (adapted from Haddow and Palomaki [46])

References

    1. Golubnitschaja O, Costigliola V, EPMA General report & recommendations in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine 2012: white paper of the European Association for Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine. EPMA J. 2012;3(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1878-5085-3-14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grech G, Zhan X, Yoo BC, Bubnov R, Hagan S, Danesi R, et al. EPMA position paper in cancer: current overview and future perspectives. EPMA J. 2015;6:9. doi: 10.1186/s13167-015-0030-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chow IP, Bryant T, Swanson S, Schoeninger B. Dissecting the value of companion diagnostics. IMS Consulting Group. 2013. Accessed from http://www.imshealth.com/deployedfiles/imshealth/Global/Content/Healthca... on May 18, 2015.
    1. Carson J. Molecular methods rapidly gain ground in infectious disease diagnostics. Frost & Sullivan. 2014. Accessed from http://ww2.frost.com/news/press-releases/molecular-methodsrapidly-gain-g... on May 17, 2015.
    1. NCBI. GTR: Genetic Testing Registry. NCBI. 2015. Accessed from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gtr/ on May 29, 2015.