Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(9-10):E594-8.
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2803. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

Risk factors for hemorrhage requiring embolization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Affiliations

Risk factors for hemorrhage requiring embolization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Sitki Un et al. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the primary surgical intervention in kidney stone management. Even though it is performed quite often, the complication rates are also high. Arteriovenous fistulas following extended hemorrhages after PCNL are one of the most serious complications of this operation. Our main objective was to review the data of patients who required angiography and embolization.

Methods: In total, we included 1405 patients who underwent PCNL between 2007 and 2014. All patient data were retrospectively reviewed. All patients went under PCNL using fluoroscopy. Following informed consent, all hemorrhagic patients underwent angiography in the interventional radiology department and embolization was performed in patients with a hemorrhage focus point.

Results: A total of 147 patients (10.4%) required transfusion for post-PCNL hemorrhages. Of them, 14 (0.99%) underwent angiography and embolization (9 [64.2%] were male and 5 [35.8%] were female, with a mean age of 39.4 ± 10.2). The remaining 133 patients were conservatively managed (81 [60.9%] males and 52 [39.1%] females, with a mean age of 42.3 ± 12.4). When the predicting factors for angiography and embolization were reviewed, renal abnormalities and the mean size of stones were significant in both univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients with extended and intermittent hematuria should be monitored closely for hemodynamics; if there is an ongoing necessity for transfusion, angiography should be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The main renal artery, segmental, interlobar arteries and distal branches were reviewed.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
A microcatheter (2.4F) and guidewire (Progreat, Terumo) were used to superselecitvely catheterize the interlobar artery (the hemorrhage point.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Control angiography following coil embolization.

References

    1. Ritter M, Krombach P, Michel M. Percutaneous stone removal. Eur Urol Suppl. 2011;10:433–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eursup.2011.07.005. - DOI
    1. Martin X, Murat FJ, Feitosa LC, et al. Severe bleeding after nephrolithotomy: Results of hyperselective embolization. Eur Urol. 2000;37:136–9. doi: 10.1159/000020129. - DOI - PubMed
    1. El-Kenawy MR, El-Kappany HA, El-Diasty TA, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones in over 1000 patients. Br J Urol. 1992;69:470. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1992.tb15590.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sacha K, Szewczyk W, Bar K. Massive haemorrhage presenting as a complication after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Int Urol Nephrol. 1996;28:315. doi: 10.1007/BF02550492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gupta M, Bellman GC, Smith AD. Massive hemorrhage from renal vein injury during percutaneous renal surgery: Endourological management. J Urol. 1997;157:795. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65042-0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources